找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Making the Moral Case for Social Sciences; Stemming the Tide Karl Spracklen Book 2016 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publisher

[復制鏈接]
查看: 39028|回復: 36
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:34:54 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Making the Moral Case for Social Sciences
副標題Stemming the Tide
編輯Karl Spracklen
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/622/621798/621798.mp4
圖書封面Titlebook: Making the Moral Case for Social Sciences; Stemming the Tide Karl Spracklen Book 2016 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publisher
描述.The social sciences have a legitimacy problem in the modern world. The natural sciences are viewed as ‘proper science‘ by journalists and policy-makers because they discover ‘truths‘, make money, and help governments solve problems. In turn, defenders of the social sciences borrow the language of instrumentality, profit and policy impact. Karl Spracklen, by contrast, makes the moral case for the social sciences, arguing that they are a necessary social good capable of fighting inequality and revealing the workings of hegemonic power.. .
出版日期Book 2016
關鍵詞Social sciences; power; hegemony; moral case; social good; Defence; government; Moral; morality; quality; soci
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/9781137577917
isbn_ebook978-1-137-57791-7
copyrightPalgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2016
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Making the Moral Case for Social Sciences影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Making the Moral Case for Social Sciences影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Making the Moral Case for Social Sciences網絡公開度




書目名稱Making the Moral Case for Social Sciences網絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Making the Moral Case for Social Sciences被引頻次




書目名稱Making the Moral Case for Social Sciences被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Making the Moral Case for Social Sciences年度引用




書目名稱Making the Moral Case for Social Sciences年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Making the Moral Case for Social Sciences讀者反饋




書目名稱Making the Moral Case for Social Sciences讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:34:47 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 04:02:32 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:54:49 | 只看該作者
The Moral Case for the Social Sciences,shing; and, most importantly, they are good because they show humans how to resist inequality. Spracklen makes the case that the ability to see the world through a critical lens is the necessary moral and social good that this critical sociology gives to the social sciences, and through the social s
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:37:18 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:43:00 | 只看該作者
ven directed network can be formulated as follows: partition vertices into levels such that, ideally, there are only forward edges, that is, edges from upper levels to lower levels. In practice, the ideal case is impossible, so instead we minimize some penalty function on the backward edges. One pra
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:06:32 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 21:25:13 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 02:29:53 | 只看該作者
Karl Spracklenmodels without access to past data. Current methods focus only on selecting a sub-network for a new task that reduces forgetting of past tasks. However, this selection could limit the forward transfer of . past knowledge that helps in future learning. Our study reveals that satisfying both objective
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:13:38 | 只看該作者
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網 吾愛論文網 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-25 22:18
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
贺兰县| 西城区| 双流县| 石台县| 凤山市| 乌什县| 新平| 舒兰市| 通山县| 海南省| 新龙县| 西林县| 江西省| 凤台县| 佛坪县| 丹江口市| 芜湖市| 平谷区| 万州区| 利辛县| 兴隆县| 璧山县| 出国| 隆德县| 奈曼旗| 驻马店市| 宣城市| 拜城县| 胶州市| 阿瓦提县| 囊谦县| 阿克| 青铜峡市| 来宾市| 清河县| 铁力市| 遂平县| 涟源市| 千阳县| 沐川县| 平湖市|