找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Making the Moral Case for Social Sciences; Stemming the Tide Karl Spracklen Book 2016 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publisher

[復制鏈接]
樓主: EXERT
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 11:09:13 | 只看該作者
Karl Spracklenction, we studied three different multilabel classification problems, the largest being the categorization into the EUROVOC concept hierarchy with almost 4000 classes. We evaluated three algorithms: (i) the binary relevance approach which independently trains one classifier per label; (ii) the multi
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 14:16:20 | 只看該作者
tain a cluster structure over the data points generated by the entire network. Usual techniques operate by forwarding and concentrating the entire data in a central server, processing it as a multivariate stream. In this paper, we propose ., a new distributed algorithm which reduces both the dimensi
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 20:41:06 | 只看該作者
Book 2016rs because they discover ‘truths‘, make money, and help governments solve problems. In turn, defenders of the social sciences borrow the language of instrumentality, profit and policy impact. Karl Spracklen, by contrast, makes the moral case for the social sciences, arguing that they are a necessary
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 02:08:14 | 只看該作者
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 06:22:34 | 只看該作者
Introduction,ernments solve problems. Spracklen establishes critical sociology as the theoretical framework through which he will analyse the relationship between the natural sciences and the social sciences, and through which he will make the moral case for social sciences in the rest of the book.
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 10:07:27 | 只看該作者
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 14:26:08 | 只看該作者
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 17:13:53 | 只看該作者
Conclusion,moral case, and to work to ensure the moral case is central to their teaching and their research, then suggests practical steps that might be taken to help social scientists resist the pressure to be instrumental in their work.
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 20:54:26 | 只看該作者
The Attack on Social Sciences,, the natural sciences retain a privileged place in the ways of thinking and ways of legitimizing knowledge and power in the modern world. STEM thinking makes as common-sense truth the contested claim that all human experience can be reduced to its economic value, and everything social can be reduced to the natural or discarded as false knowledge.
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 23:24:24 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-25 22:18
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
阿鲁科尔沁旗| 福清市| 柳州市| 土默特右旗| 垦利县| 巴林左旗| 安岳县| 合山市| 二连浩特市| 贡觉县| 朝阳市| 增城市| 绍兴县| 班玛县| 博湖县| 台北县| 临沧市| 分宜县| 丰县| 大同市| 邓州市| 南川市| 绵竹市| 咸宁市| 垦利县| 东阳市| 晋江市| 融水| 蒲城县| 城口县| 海门市| 北京市| 阳春市| 屏东县| 工布江达县| 白河县| 阿鲁科尔沁旗| 沅江市| 广安市| 新竹市| 台前县|