找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: ;

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: Withdrawal
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 10:05:06 | 只看該作者
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 15:45:55 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-94455-9iables, causal links, polarity, delay, feedback, stocks, flows, rates, equifinality, and multifinality. Group model building describes a variety of methods for involving clients or stakeholders in the creation of a system dynamics model.
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 21:24:53 | 只看該作者
Organisation der Personalwirtschaftupports increases in consensus, insight, communication quality, commitment to conclusions, and process efficiency, compared with other tools. This chapter summarises this evidence and presents a possible research agenda for filling key gaps.
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 00:38:42 | 只看該作者
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 04:17:01 | 只看該作者
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 09:18:46 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-86060-6is to support group decision-making. This chapter explores the outcomes that are sought or desired by clients commissioning group decision-making processes. Evidence is drawn from New Zealand public servants, and literature from other contexts. Clients tend to be strongly interested in achieving enduring consensus between participants.
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 13:41:09 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-8131-8orts on four case studies from the New Zealand public sector, using an observational study design and a commonly used post-workshop survey tool. The case studies show evidence of increased communication quality, insight, consensus, and commitment to conclusions.
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 18:11:58 | 只看該作者
Arbeitsplatz- und Arbeitszeitgestaltung,usible explanations in the context of the cases explored in this book: operator logic; system archetypes; modelling as persuasion; boundary objects; and cognitive bias. This chapter reports on interviews with 30 participants in group model building workshops to examine the relative level of support for each proposed mechanism.
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 22:12:54 | 只看該作者
Desired Outcomes of Group Decisions,is to support group decision-making. This chapter explores the outcomes that are sought or desired by clients commissioning group decision-making processes. Evidence is drawn from New Zealand public servants, and literature from other contexts. Clients tend to be strongly interested in achieving enduring consensus between participants.
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 02:10:55 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-7 17:53
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
松滋市| 巨鹿县| 西昌市| 伊宁县| 黄龙县| 平原县| 兴义市| 称多县| 黔江区| 酒泉市| 金湖县| 临湘市| 新疆| 古田县| 淄博市| 循化| 崇礼县| 肇庆市| 井冈山市| 滨海县| 吉木乃县| 广东省| 南乐县| 贵定县| 临清市| 岐山县| 讷河市| 嵊泗县| 武宣县| 诸城市| 永春县| 余干县| 遂昌县| 文登市| 桂平市| 双城市| 枞阳县| 新巴尔虎右旗| 浦江县| 颍上县| 昭苏县|