Titlebook: Gender and Family in European Economic Policy; Developments in the Diana Auth,Jutta Hergenhan,Barbara Holland-Cunz Book 2017 The Editor(s)

次要

書目名稱Gender and Family in European Economic Policy影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Gender and Family in European Economic Policy影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Gender and Family in European Economic Policy網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Gender and Family in European Economic Policy網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Gender and Family in European Economic Policy被引頻次




書目名稱Gender and Family in European Economic Policy被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Gender and Family in European Economic Policy年度引用




書目名稱Gender and Family in European Economic Policy年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Gender and Family in European Economic Policy讀者反饋




書目名稱Gender and Family in European Economic Policy讀者反饋學科排名

陰郁

James Hanley and the Colours of War,lective bargaining and the litigation process depicted as complements, allowing to address implicit representations of the value of women’s work and to challenge traditional unions’ views on collective bargaining.

MEET

HPA533

labyrinth

Parallel

Social Investment or Gender Equality? Aims, Instruments, and Outcomes of Parental Leave Regulations ts, however, shows less clear differences as the parental leave policies are influenced by a mixture of the two paradigms in both countries. In our conclusion, we interpret our empirical findings with regard to social policy traditions and trajectories.

Parallel

Targeted Measures Versus Change of Political Culture: How Can Gender Equality Best Be Achieved?inism. At this historic moment in Europe, successful translation and implementation of gender equality reforms could best be argued within a conservative framing, especially difference-feminist arguments. Paradoxically, such frames seem to be best to override reactionary frames.

figment

FIG

,Experimenting with Film Scores, 1967–1970,and went quite smoothly through the economic crisis, the country did not invest so much in care services, but rather in financial support for the families, with stronger maternalist direction in public discourse on childbearing, especially during the right-wing coalition in office since November 2015.

intricacy

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04612-6ield and concludes by showing that dominant professional politicians use gender-equality measures in a way that allows them to preserve masculine power and in-group sociability and to reproduce a conservative gender order.