Titlebook: Exploring Sexuality in Schools; The Intersectional R Dorottya Rédai Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2019 Sexualit

根深蒂固

書目名稱Exploring Sexuality in Schools影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Exploring Sexuality in Schools影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Exploring Sexuality in Schools網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Exploring Sexuality in Schools網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名




書目名稱Exploring Sexuality in Schools被引頻次




書目名稱Exploring Sexuality in Schools被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Exploring Sexuality in Schools年度引用




書目名稱Exploring Sexuality in Schools年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Exploring Sexuality in Schools讀者反饋




書目名稱Exploring Sexuality in Schools讀者反饋學科排名

Chronological

Recess

Conclusion — The Fall and Rise of Journalism’s sexuality; (2) the intersectional constitution of gendered, sexual, ethnic/raced and classed subjectivities; (3) the reproduction of social inequalities in education. This brief outline of a conceptual framework of the study is followed by a description of the organization of the book, in which t

極大的痛苦

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26083-5ers and students, as well as the broader educational context, with specific attention to the structural factors that contribute to the reproduction of social inequalities in Hungarian secondary education. Then she discusses some methodological and ethical issues the research process brought up. She

大吃大喝

Physikalische und chemische Grundlagen,prevention, and experiences of sexual abuse are discussed. She also reflects on challenges with finding LGBT respondents. Then she discusses how sexuality is present in the physical space of Marzipan and argues that schools are a space for sexual activities, not only a space for the constitution of

混雜人

混雜人

Skeletons via Shocks of Boundary Evolutionnalyses three dominant pleasure discourses which constitute gender distinctions: the ‘natural’ vs. ‘learnt’ character of experiencing sexual pleasure; discourses of sexual objectification and self-objectification; and the sexual double standard and the girlfriend/slut and virgin/whore dichotomies. T

的’

,Herausfordernde Gespr?chssituationen,st, she reviews relevant concepts in Hungarian scholarship on Roma/Gypsy ethnicity and in international literature on race/ethnicity and whiteness. Then she reflects on how the ethnic subjectivities of her Gypsy respondents are constructed, how they draw group boundaries and personal ethnic identiti

失誤

Johannes Fromme,Florian Kiefer,Jens Holzegories of gender, race/ethnicity and class, and students’ subjectivities based on these categories, and about how the sexuality discourses and practices she has identified and the subjectivities they constitute contribute to the re-inscription of social inequalities in schooling. She summarizes her

Conduit