Titlebook: Essays on G?del’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer; Mark Atten Book 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015 Edmu

柳條筐

書目名稱Essays on G?del’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Essays on G?del’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Essays on G?del’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Essays on G?del’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Essays on G?del’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer被引頻次




書目名稱Essays on G?del’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Essays on G?del’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer年度引用




書目名稱Essays on G?del’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Essays on G?del’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer讀者反饋




書目名稱Essays on G?del’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

偽造者

A Note on Leibniz’s Argument Against Infinite WholesThe refutation of this argument by Russell and others is equally well known. In this note, I argue (against positions recently defended by Arthur, Breger, and Brown) for the following three claims: (1) Leibniz himself had all the means to devise and accept this refutation; (2) This refutation does n

談判

Monads and Sets: On G?del, Leibniz, and the Reflection Principle the mathematical and philosophical background to G?del’s argument, reconstruct the proposed analogy in detail, and argue that it has no justificatory force. The paper also provides further support for G?del’s idea that the monadology needs to be reconstructed phenomenologically, by showing that the

faucet

G?del’s Dialectica Interpretation and Leibnizd but in which one immediately notices the longhand name ‘Leibniz’. When transcribed and put into context, the note allows one to show that Leibniz was a source of inspiration for G?del’s revision of the Dialectica Interpretation.

漫步

嘴唇可修剪

嘴唇可修剪

不可接觸

Mortal

G?del and Intuitionismn G?del’s technical work. Then it is argued that the closest rapprochement of G?del to intuitionism is seen in the development of the Dialectica Interpretation, during which he came to accept the notion of computable functional of finite type as primitive. It is shown that G?del already thought of t

致詞

Construction and Constitution in Mathematicsect coincide. Various objections to Brouwer’s intuitionism that have been raised in recent phenomenological literature (by Hill, Rosado Haddock, and Tieszen) are addressed. Then I present objections to G?del’s project of founding classical mathematics on transcendental phenomenology. The problem for