找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Essays on G?del’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer; Mark Atten Book 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015 Edmu

[復制鏈接]
查看: 41561|回復: 50
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:45:08 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Essays on G?del’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer
編輯Mark Atten
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/316/315310/315310.mp4
概述Draws extensively on G?del‘s archive.Analyses historical and systematical aspects of G?del‘s philosophical project.Evaluates G?del‘s use of phenomenology and challenges recent interpretations.Includes
叢書名稱Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science
圖書封面Titlebook: Essays on G?del’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer;  Mark Atten Book 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015 Edmu
描述.This volume tackles G?del‘s two-stage project of first using Husserl‘s transcendental phenomenology to reconstruct and develop Leibniz‘ monadology, and then founding classical mathematics on the metaphysics thus obtained. The author analyses the historical and systematic aspects of that project, and then evaluates it, with an emphasis on the second stage..The book is organised around G?del‘s use of Leibniz, Husserl and Brouwer. Far from considering past philosophers irrelevant to actual systematic concerns, G?del embraced the use of historical authors to frame his own philosophical perspective. The philosophies of Leibniz and Husserl define his project, while Brouwer‘s intuitionism is its principal foil: the close affinities between phenomenology and intuitionism set the bar for G?del‘s attempt to go far beyond intuitionism..The four central essays are `Monads and sets‘, `On the philosophical development of Kurt G?del‘, `G?del and intuitionism‘, and `Construction and constitution in mathematics‘. The first analyses and criticises G?del‘s attempt to justify, by an argument from analogy with the monadology, the reflection principle in set theory. It also provides further support for
出版日期Book 2015
關鍵詞Edmund Husserl; Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz; Kurt G?del; L; E; J; Brouwer; Platonism; intuitionism; monado
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10031-9
isbn_softcover978-3-319-37657-8
isbn_ebook978-3-319-10031-9Series ISSN 2214-9775 Series E-ISSN 2214-9783
issn_series 2214-9775
copyrightSpringer International Publishing Switzerland 2015
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Essays on G?del’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Essays on G?del’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Essays on G?del’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Essays on G?del’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Essays on G?del’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer被引頻次




書目名稱Essays on G?del’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Essays on G?del’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer年度引用




書目名稱Essays on G?del’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Essays on G?del’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer讀者反饋




書目名稱Essays on G?del’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:42:56 | 只看該作者
A Note on Leibniz’s Argument Against Infinite WholesThe refutation of this argument by Russell and others is equally well known. In this note, I argue (against positions recently defended by Arthur, Breger, and Brown) for the following three claims: (1) Leibniz himself had all the means to devise and accept this refutation; (2) This refutation does n
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:38:05 | 只看該作者
Monads and Sets: On G?del, Leibniz, and the Reflection Principle the mathematical and philosophical background to G?del’s argument, reconstruct the proposed analogy in detail, and argue that it has no justificatory force. The paper also provides further support for G?del’s idea that the monadology needs to be reconstructed phenomenologically, by showing that the
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:49:05 | 只看該作者
G?del’s Dialectica Interpretation and Leibnizd but in which one immediately notices the longhand name ‘Leibniz’. When transcribed and put into context, the note allows one to show that Leibniz was a source of inspiration for G?del’s revision of the Dialectica Interpretation.
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:46:48 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:14:06 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:37:32 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:24:20 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:41:41 | 只看該作者
G?del and Intuitionismn G?del’s technical work. Then it is argued that the closest rapprochement of G?del to intuitionism is seen in the development of the Dialectica Interpretation, during which he came to accept the notion of computable functional of finite type as primitive. It is shown that G?del already thought of t
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:43:01 | 只看該作者
Construction and Constitution in Mathematicsect coincide. Various objections to Brouwer’s intuitionism that have been raised in recent phenomenological literature (by Hill, Rosado Haddock, and Tieszen) are addressed. Then I present objections to G?del’s project of founding classical mathematics on transcendental phenomenology. The problem for
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-6 07:49
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
泰兴市| 高唐县| 甘洛县| 新邵县| 甘孜县| 绥宁县| 阿坝县| 兴化市| 廊坊市| 临澧县| 泽库县| 四平市| 漳浦县| 滨海县| 静安区| 卢龙县| 黎平县| 马尔康县| 红原县| 抚松县| 宜川县| 福海县| 三台县| 青岛市| 阿拉善盟| 刚察县| 新余市| 精河县| 富阳市| 威信县| 临城县| 连平县| 城步| 厦门市| 息烽县| 宜宾市| 沂南县| 光山县| 龙海市| 南召县| 沁阳市|