Titlebook: Disparity and Discrimination in Labour Market Outcomes in India; A Quantitative Analy Vani Kant Borooah Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applica

Inveterate

ADOPT

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16264-1India; Occupation; Wages; Discrimination; Affirmative Action; Indian labour market; The National Rural Emp

書法

ostrish

喪失

Anterior

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39081-9tutionally mandated duty to favour persons from the “reserved” categories (the Scheduled Castes, the Scheduled Tribes, and the Other Backward Classes) at the expense of persons from the “non-reserved” or “general” categories, in public sector jobs. Given that India’s experiment with affirmative acti

斷言

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03998-1 religion, are treated fairly in the jobs market. A key aspect of this relates to inter-group differences in the likelihood of attaining different levels of occupational success. The issue here is whether these differences in likelihood are justified by differences in the distribution of . or whethe

innovation

The Art of Allusion in Victorian Fictionn), and permanent jobs—across different subgroups of the population. Although the analysis of this chapter echoes that of Chap. ., which is cast in terms of regular salaried and wage employment and casual employment, the novelty of this chapter is twofold. First, it . addresses the question of job t

Cultivate

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2748-7 and female workers and between workers from different social groups—the Scheduled Tribes, the Scheduled Cates, the non-Muslim Other Backward Classes, Muslims, and the Forward Castes. The thrust of the analysis in this chapter is to decompose the difference in wages between men and women, and betwee

sultry