找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Defeasible Deontic Logic; Donald Nute Book 1997 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 1997 artificial intelligence.deontic logic.intelligen

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: BOUT
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 00:31:53 | 只看該作者
Ceyda Altiparmakogullari,Deniz Hasirciasoning about what normally is the case. In defeasible deontic logic these two are combined. An example of this combination is the sentence ‘normally, you should do .’. Now the problem is what to conclude about somebody who does not do .? Is this an exception to the normality claim, or is it a viola
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 02:59:57 | 只看該作者
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 06:59:49 | 只看該作者
Parties and Party Systems in Eastern Europeossible to have the one without the other. Still, where there is no reason to think the patient doesn’t have the condition, it will seem that we can suppose he does. Similarly, that you have promised to meet me is a reason for you to do so. It is a . reason since it can happen that, in spite of your
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 11:14:05 | 只看該作者
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 16:51:14 | 只看該作者
The Comparative Politics of Eastern Europeal truth is consistent and completely determinate, (2) all particular ethical truths are deducible from a set of exceptionless general principles. Ethical theorists as diverse as Aristotelian naturalists, ethical hedonists, utilitarians, Moorean intuitionists, Kantians, relativists and subjectivists
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 19:08:21 | 只看該作者
History, Europe and the Politics of the Eastconflicting. ‘Prioritised’ rules received attention in the research on the formalisation of nonmonotonic reasoning, particularly as a way of modeling the choice criterion in dealing with exceptions (cf. (Poole, 1988); (Shoham, 1988); (Brewka, 1991); (Prakken, 1993)).
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 22:06:08 | 只看該作者
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 03:26:56 | 只看該作者
Public Opinion and Electoral Changeelations between defeasibility, deontic modality, and belief revision. Alchourrón, the Argentine gentleman lawyer and polymath, stood at the apex where met three of this half-century’s most important developments in reasoning and the mathematical modeling of reasoning. His passing must be marked wit
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 09:36:45 | 只看該作者
Synthese Libraryhttp://image.papertrans.cn/d/image/264707.jpg
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 12:19:59 | 只看該作者
Defeasible Deontic Logic978-94-015-8851-5Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-30 16:51
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
宁晋县| 襄垣县| 徐水县| 寿光市| 奎屯市| 武宁县| 富锦市| 曲麻莱县| 兴安县| 江山市| 正宁县| 扬州市| 花莲县| 顺昌县| 巴里| 高台县| 高安市| 富宁县| 尚义县| 北海市| 万荣县| 博湖县| 广昌县| 陆河县| 陆丰市| 道孚县| 宿松县| 平山县| 和顺县| 崇明县| 盱眙县| 临泽县| 梁河县| 乐安县| 辽宁省| 崇左市| 锦州市| 洪湖市| 富宁县| 尼玛县| 高密市|