Titlebook: Defeasible Deontic Logic; Donald Nute Book 1997 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 1997 artificial intelligence.deontic logic.intelligen

BOUT

書目名稱Defeasible Deontic Logic影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Defeasible Deontic Logic影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Defeasible Deontic Logic網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Defeasible Deontic Logic網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Defeasible Deontic Logic被引頻次




書目名稱Defeasible Deontic Logic被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Defeasible Deontic Logic年度引用




書目名稱Defeasible Deontic Logic年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Defeasible Deontic Logic讀者反饋




書目名稱Defeasible Deontic Logic讀者反饋學科排名

PLIC

Developments in East European Politicshey had taken everything from him but his bow. As the play opens, the gods reveal to Odysseus that only that bow can win the Trojan War. So, Odysseus orders Neoptolemus to trick Philoctetes out of his bow.

GENRE

Public Opinion and Electoral Changee met three of this half-century’s most important developments in reasoning and the mathematical modeling of reasoning. His passing must be marked with the particular sadness of the loss of the rare opposing thinker worth forthrightly engaging (although it must be confessed that this author never succeeded in doing so).

慌張

Reasons to Think and Act,uppose he does. Similarly, that you have promised to meet me is a reason for you to do so. It is a . reason since it can happen that, in spite of your promise, you don’t have the duty to meet me. Still, where there is no reason to think you don’t have this duty, it will seem that you ought to meet me.

Outwit

其他

,Alchourrón and von Wright on Conflict Among Norms,e met three of this half-century’s most important developments in reasoning and the mathematical modeling of reasoning. His passing must be marked with the particular sadness of the loss of the rare opposing thinker worth forthrightly engaging (although it must be confessed that this author never succeeded in doing so).

其他

ITCH

Developments in Design Research and Practiceat one . use force in self defense; that is, the rule is defeated when someone violates the rule not to use force. And the rule permitting force in self defense is itself defeasible since one . use force even in self defense if one believes he is being restrained by a policeman (Nozick, 1968).

LOPE

Ceyda Altiparmakogullari,Deniz Hasircie we analyze this overlap, and we also show that this confusion can be avoided if one makes the proper distinctions between different types of defeasibility. Furthermore, we also show that these distinctions are essential for an adequate analysis of notorious contrary-to-duty paradoxes such as the Chisholm and Forrester paradoxes.

憤怒事實