找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Defeasible Deontic Logic; Donald Nute Book 1997 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 1997 artificial intelligence.deontic logic.intelligen

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: BOUT
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 04:31:07 | 只看該作者
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 08:08:36 | 只看該作者
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 14:27:41 | 只看該作者
Developments in East European PoliticsOne of the main issues in the discussion on standard deontic logic (SDL) is the representation of contrary-to-duty (CTD) obligations. A well-known example is Forrester’s (1984) paradox of the gentle murderer: it is forbidden to kill, but if one kills, one ought to kill gently.
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 16:52:25 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22898-0Since the publication of (Chisholm, 1963), deontic logicians have struggled with the problem of supplying an adequate formal characterisation of the distinction between primary obligations and those obligations — called “contrary—to—duty” by Chisholm — which come into force when some other obligation is violated.
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 21:17:03 | 只看該作者
Dyadic Deontic Logic and Contrary-to-Duty Obligations,One of the main issues in the discussion on standard deontic logic (SDL) is the representation of contrary-to-duty (CTD) obligations. A well-known example is Forrester’s (1984) paradox of the gentle murderer: it is forbidden to kill, but if one kills, one ought to kill gently.
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 03:57:09 | 只看該作者
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 05:14:24 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86596-2 notions from normative reasoning, including the notions of . obligation, contrary-to-duty obligations, and moral dilemmas have raised serious problems for deontic logicians, problems which have defied solution within standard deontic logic and its extensions. As a result, deontic logic has fallen i
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 09:47:50 | 只看該作者
Nitzan Cohen,Emma Sicher,Se?il U?ur Yavuz argue in this paper, however, that, at least for certain purposes, the techniques recently developed within the field of nonmonotonic logic may provide a better theoretical framework for the formal study of normative reasoning than the usual modal treatment.
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 15:26:30 | 只看該作者
Developments in Design Research and Practicedo A given B&C or one is permitted not to do A given B&C. In these cases the latter rules . the first one. We claim that most normative systems that are complex enough to guide actions in light of the fact that some rules have been violated will contain defeasible rules. For example, the Model Penal
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 17:01:00 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-30 22:43
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
旺苍县| 金秀| 抚宁县| 元谋县| 米泉市| 广昌县| 怀化市| 望谟县| 乐平市| 阳朔县| 克山县| 门源| 上林县| 泾源县| 连江县| 东台市| 河北区| 扎鲁特旗| 西吉县| 阿拉尔市| 贵州省| 方山县| 囊谦县| 祁门县| 徐汇区| 闸北区| 绍兴县| 将乐县| 浦城县| 麻江县| 武安市| 濉溪县| 石台县| 屏南县| 德惠市| 华安县| 满城县| 宣武区| 莎车县| 卓资县| 河西区|