找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Defeasible Deontic Logic; Donald Nute Book 1997 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 1997 artificial intelligence.deontic logic.intelligen

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: BOUT
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 04:31:07 | 只看該作者
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 08:08:36 | 只看該作者
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 14:27:41 | 只看該作者
Developments in East European PoliticsOne of the main issues in the discussion on standard deontic logic (SDL) is the representation of contrary-to-duty (CTD) obligations. A well-known example is Forrester’s (1984) paradox of the gentle murderer: it is forbidden to kill, but if one kills, one ought to kill gently.
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 16:52:25 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22898-0Since the publication of (Chisholm, 1963), deontic logicians have struggled with the problem of supplying an adequate formal characterisation of the distinction between primary obligations and those obligations — called “contrary—to—duty” by Chisholm — which come into force when some other obligation is violated.
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 21:17:03 | 只看該作者
Dyadic Deontic Logic and Contrary-to-Duty Obligations,One of the main issues in the discussion on standard deontic logic (SDL) is the representation of contrary-to-duty (CTD) obligations. A well-known example is Forrester’s (1984) paradox of the gentle murderer: it is forbidden to kill, but if one kills, one ought to kill gently.
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 03:57:09 | 只看該作者
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 05:14:24 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86596-2 notions from normative reasoning, including the notions of . obligation, contrary-to-duty obligations, and moral dilemmas have raised serious problems for deontic logicians, problems which have defied solution within standard deontic logic and its extensions. As a result, deontic logic has fallen i
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 09:47:50 | 只看該作者
Nitzan Cohen,Emma Sicher,Se?il U?ur Yavuz argue in this paper, however, that, at least for certain purposes, the techniques recently developed within the field of nonmonotonic logic may provide a better theoretical framework for the formal study of normative reasoning than the usual modal treatment.
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 15:26:30 | 只看該作者
Developments in Design Research and Practicedo A given B&C or one is permitted not to do A given B&C. In these cases the latter rules . the first one. We claim that most normative systems that are complex enough to guide actions in light of the fact that some rules have been violated will contain defeasible rules. For example, the Model Penal
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 17:01:00 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-30 18:27
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
沙洋县| 繁昌县| 龙口市| 绍兴市| 石首市| 商都县| 黄梅县| 河南省| 茶陵县| 寻甸| 苗栗市| 楚雄市| 田阳县| 西贡区| 自贡市| 杭锦后旗| 大同市| 广安市| 阳城县| 兴宁市| 忻城县| 凯里市| 彩票| 克什克腾旗| 高邮市| 三台县| 渭源县| 沁阳市| 大关县| 淳化县| 新平| 桦甸市| 始兴县| 梁河县| 沅江市| 南丰县| 双牌县| 安庆市| 富川| 恭城| 武鸣县|