找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Compromise, Peace and Public Justification; Political Morality B Fabian Wendt Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 201

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: Asphyxia
41#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 15:47:18 | 只看該作者
42#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 22:31:48 | 只看該作者
The Immunotracing of Keratinocyte Subsetshe discusses the idea of a ‘just peace,’ he rejects the claim that peace is a mere precondition for justice and not a value of its own, and he rejects the idea that realizing justice is necessary for achieving sufficiently stable peace.
43#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 01:59:37 | 只看該作者
The Fibrous Proteins of the Epidermisaffairs of freely associated groups. Wendt argues that this is not the conception of peace we should adopt if we want a conception of peace that is feasible without moral consensus, something that allows us to live together in the face of moral disagreement.
44#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 05:51:14 | 只看該作者
45#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 10:07:45 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137437907hese answers can show that we should conceive public justification as a strictly necessary requirement for the moral justification of constitutional essentials (or laws more generally). But he also argues that one Rawlsian answer successfully shows that public justification should at least be concei
46#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 12:23:42 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137437907t the requirement of respect for persons is not sufficient to ground a strict principle of public justification, but that it indeed is a source of the value of public justification. Public justification has constitutive moral value because it constitutes an expression of respect for persons.
47#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 18:14:00 | 只看該作者
48#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 22:31:22 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137437907 moral evaluation. They thus provide moral reasons to make compromises. He also discusses what kind of moral reasons these are, he says a few words on other second-level values, and he discusses one of Simon May’s arguments against principled reasons to compromise in politics.
49#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 00:16:39 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78884-0 consent, and, second, on whether the other party to the compromise violated basic moral rights in order to get one’s consent, or threatened to violate basic moral rights. When consent is not genuine, there is no genuine compromise as well.
50#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 04:37:16 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-14 06:21
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
南涧| 肇庆市| 彭水| 务川| 新巴尔虎左旗| 许昌市| 乐亭县| 施甸县| 河间市| 乐业县| 鄂托克前旗| 商丘市| 朔州市| 安化县| 邢台市| 绩溪县| 福清市| 桐城市| 确山县| 广安市| 东乡县| 宁阳县| 上林县| 青浦区| 辰溪县| 榆中县| 房产| 西宁市| 赞皇县| 平山县| 都昌县| 株洲市| 万盛区| 平乡县| 双江| 尼玛县| 宕昌县| 名山县| 百色市| 邵阳市| 鄂托克前旗|