Titlebook: Compromise, Peace and Public Justification; Political Morality B Fabian Wendt Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 201

Asphyxia

書目名稱Compromise, Peace and Public Justification影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Compromise, Peace and Public Justification影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Compromise, Peace and Public Justification網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Compromise, Peace and Public Justification網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Compromise, Peace and Public Justification被引頻次




書目名稱Compromise, Peace and Public Justification被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Compromise, Peace and Public Justification年度引用




書目名稱Compromise, Peace and Public Justification年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Compromise, Peace and Public Justification讀者反饋




書目名稱Compromise, Peace and Public Justification讀者反饋學科排名

幸福愉悅感

Two Levels of Moral Evaluationossibility of making moral compromises for moral reasons. On the first level, one evaluates what the best arrangement would be. On the second level, one evaluates what the best arrangement would be under circumstances of disagreement about what the best arrangement would be. In a moral compromise, o

Cumulus

Consentine consent is. Whether consent is genuine, he argues, does neither depend on whether one faces offers or threats, nor does it depend on whether these offers or threats are coercive or exploitative. Instead, it depends, first, on whether one has the cognitive and emotional capacity to give voluntary

系列

我還要背著他

The Value of Peacet people most of the time. He also debates John Gray’s value pluralist argument for giving peace pride of place. He argues that value pluralism cannot show that peace has a special place among all values. What is special about peace is that it is in the interest of almost everyone.

善變

善變

外向者

Public Justification: The Basic Idealization of public justification has to deal with (at least) the following four issues: What is to be publicly justifiable? Who is the relevant constituency of public justification? How far should members of the constituency be idealized? Do justifying reasons have to be public reasons?

Medicaid

Rawls, Stability and Public Justificationhese answers can show that we should conceive public justification as a strictly necessary requirement for the moral justification of constitutional essentials (or laws more generally). But he also argues that one Rawlsian answer successfully shows that public justification should at least be concei

新鮮

Respect and Public Justificationt the requirement of respect for persons is not sufficient to ground a strict principle of public justification, but that it indeed is a source of the value of public justification. Public justification has constitutive moral value because it constitutes an expression of respect for persons.