找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Compromise, Peace and Public Justification; Political Morality B Fabian Wendt Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 201

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 23681|回復(fù): 54
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:44:39 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Compromise, Peace and Public Justification
副標(biāo)題Political Morality B
編輯Fabian Wendt
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/233/232006/232006.mp4
概述Offers a unique perspective on the nature of compromise, peace and public justification.Documents a systematic theory applicable to politicians and philosophers.Provides a clear, rigorous and well-doc
圖書封面Titlebook: Compromise, Peace and Public Justification; Political Morality B Fabian Wendt Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 201
描述.This book explores the morality of compromising. The author argues that peace and public justification are values that provide moral reasons to make compromises in politics, including compromises that establish unjust laws or institutions. He explains how it is possible to have moral reasons to agree to moral compromises and he debates our moral duties and obligations in making such compromises. The book also contains discussions of the sources of the value of public justification, the relation between peace and justice, the nature of modus vivendi arrangements and the connections between compromise, liberal institutions and legitimacy. In exploring the morality of compromising, the book thus provides some outlines for a map of political morality beyond justice..
出版日期Book 2016
關(guān)鍵詞morality; justice; politics; values; community
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28877-2
isbn_softcover978-3-319-80447-7
isbn_ebook978-3-319-28877-2
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Compromise, Peace and Public Justification影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Compromise, Peace and Public Justification影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Compromise, Peace and Public Justification網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書目名稱Compromise, Peace and Public Justification網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Compromise, Peace and Public Justification被引頻次




書目名稱Compromise, Peace and Public Justification被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Compromise, Peace and Public Justification年度引用




書目名稱Compromise, Peace and Public Justification年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Compromise, Peace and Public Justification讀者反饋




書目名稱Compromise, Peace and Public Justification讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

1票 100.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:18:00 | 只看該作者
Two Levels of Moral Evaluationossibility of making moral compromises for moral reasons. On the first level, one evaluates what the best arrangement would be. On the second level, one evaluates what the best arrangement would be under circumstances of disagreement about what the best arrangement would be. In a moral compromise, o
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:53:06 | 只看該作者
Consentine consent is. Whether consent is genuine, he argues, does neither depend on whether one faces offers or threats, nor does it depend on whether these offers or threats are coercive or exploitative. Instead, it depends, first, on whether one has the cognitive and emotional capacity to give voluntary
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:23:10 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:29:27 | 只看該作者
The Value of Peacet people most of the time. He also debates John Gray’s value pluralist argument for giving peace pride of place. He argues that value pluralism cannot show that peace has a special place among all values. What is special about peace is that it is in the interest of almost everyone.
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:28:08 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:33:40 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:03:06 | 只看該作者
Public Justification: The Basic Idealization of public justification has to deal with (at least) the following four issues: What is to be publicly justifiable? Who is the relevant constituency of public justification? How far should members of the constituency be idealized? Do justifying reasons have to be public reasons?
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:09:45 | 只看該作者
Rawls, Stability and Public Justificationhese answers can show that we should conceive public justification as a strictly necessary requirement for the moral justification of constitutional essentials (or laws more generally). But he also argues that one Rawlsian answer successfully shows that public justification should at least be concei
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:17:38 | 只看該作者
Respect and Public Justificationt the requirement of respect for persons is not sufficient to ground a strict principle of public justification, but that it indeed is a source of the value of public justification. Public justification has constitutive moral value because it constitutes an expression of respect for persons.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-14 08:47
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
千阳县| 渝北区| 深州市| 黔南| 布尔津县| 安庆市| 乌海市| 阜城县| 吉木乃县| 辽宁省| 辰溪县| 仲巴县| 娱乐| 麦盖提县| 高尔夫| 温泉县| 边坝县| 子洲县| 水富县| 潮州市| 松溪县| 浮山县| 巩留县| 齐齐哈尔市| 峨山| 肥西县| 景谷| 瑞昌市| 托克逊县| 全椒县| 九江县| 综艺| 庆安县| 会东县| 交口县| 宣化县| 石台县| 小金县| 买车| 江西省| 五华县|