找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Analysis of Legal Argumentation Documents; A Computational Argu Hayato Hirata,Katsumi Nitta Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The

[復制鏈接]
查看: 41051|回復: 37
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:37:02 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
期刊全稱Analysis of Legal Argumentation Documents
期刊簡稱A Computational Argu
影響因子2023Hayato Hirata,Katsumi Nitta
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/157/156389/156389.mp4
發(fā)行地址Proposes a method to automatically evaluate argumentation skills from the records of argumentation exercises.Is unique in specifically applying factors and argumentation frameworks to tax and labor ca
學科分類Translational Systems Sciences
圖書封面Titlebook: Analysis of Legal Argumentation Documents; A Computational Argu Hayato Hirata,Katsumi Nitta Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The
影響因子This book introduces methods to analyze legal documents such as negotiation records and legal precedents, using computational argumentation theory..First, a method to automatically evaluate argumentation skills from the records of argumentation exercises is proposed. In law school, argumentation exercises are often conducted and many records of them are produced. From each utterance in the record, a pattern of “speech act +factor” is extracted, and argumentation skills are evaluated from the sequences of the patterns, using a scoring prediction model constructed by multiple regression analyses between the appearance pattern and the scoring results. The usefulness of this method is shown by applying it to the example case “the garbage house problem”...Second, a method of extracting factors (elements that characterize precedents and cases) and legal .topoi. from individual precedents and using them as the expression of precedents to analyze how the pattern of factors and legal .topoi. appearing in a group of precedents affects the judgment (plaintiff wins/defendant wins) is proposed. This method has been applied to a group of tax cases..Third, the logical structure of 70 labor cases
Pindex Book 2022
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Analysis of Legal Argumentation Documents影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Analysis of Legal Argumentation Documents影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Analysis of Legal Argumentation Documents網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Analysis of Legal Argumentation Documents網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Analysis of Legal Argumentation Documents被引頻次




書目名稱Analysis of Legal Argumentation Documents被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Analysis of Legal Argumentation Documents年度引用




書目名稱Analysis of Legal Argumentation Documents年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Analysis of Legal Argumentation Documents讀者反饋




書目名稱Analysis of Legal Argumentation Documents讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:47:32 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 04:14:25 | 只看該作者
Case Analysis for Case Law Education Using Factors and Computational Argumentation Theory,rs, and at the same time, we conducted an analysis of 21 precedents on tax law intending to investigate the possibility of predicting judgments and showed that it is possible to observe the trend of judgments in tax law. However, the method in Chap. . could not sufficiently verify the logic of the p
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 05:04:46 | 只看該作者
Conclusion,Round A (competitive argumentations) and Round B (cooperative argumentations) of an intercollegiate negotiation competition as a reference, several evaluation items were selected for each type of argumentation (cooperative argumentation, competitive argumentation). We then asked the experts (A, B, a
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:36:31 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:54:56 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:39:44 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:52:26 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 02:45:49 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:38:05 | 只看該作者
Case Analysis for Case Law Education Using Factors and Computational Argumentation Theory,fically, the bipolar argumentation framework (BAF), which is an extension of the argumentation framework (AF), and the extended argumentation framework (EAF) will be used together to look at the plaintiff and defendant from both sides, and at the same time, the court’s decision will be described and
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-11 22:09
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
凤凰县| 筠连县| 登封市| 蓬莱市| 青铜峡市| 宁化县| 视频| 清镇市| 临颍县| 五河县| 周至县| 永仁县| 自治县| 凯里市| 平塘县| 武义县| 喀喇| 扬州市| 平陆县| 潼南县| 桃园市| 富锦市| 龙口市| 英山县| 五家渠市| 江达县| 东方市| 元阳县| 康平县| 新余市| 邹城市| 平阴县| 拉萨市| 道孚县| 府谷县| 尉犁县| 永善县| 九寨沟县| 闽侯县| 奉新县| 大宁县|