找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Analysis of Legal Argumentation Documents; A Computational Argu Hayato Hirata,Katsumi Nitta Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The

[復制鏈接]
樓主: affidavit
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 12:37:26 | 只看該作者
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 17:00:24 | 只看該作者
2197-8832 .topoi. appearing in a group of precedents affects the judgment (plaintiff wins/defendant wins) is proposed. This method has been applied to a group of tax cases..Third, the logical structure of 70 labor cases 978-981-19-2930-4978-981-19-2928-1Series ISSN 2197-8832 Series E-ISSN 2197-8840
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 19:00:31 | 只看該作者
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 01:51:07 | 只看該作者
Similarity Laws for Explosions, as well as the reasons and conclusions of the judge. Although judicial precedents contain a lot of information, it is difficult to compare judicial precedents because of the huge amount of text and the time required to read and understand them, and their use has not been fully explored in legal edu
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 03:44:27 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45726-0rs, and at the same time, we conducted an analysis of 21 precedents on tax law intending to investigate the possibility of predicting judgments and showed that it is possible to observe the trend of judgments in tax law. However, the method in Chap. . could not sufficiently verify the logic of the p
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 08:56:43 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45726-0Round A (competitive argumentations) and Round B (cooperative argumentations) of an intercollegiate negotiation competition as a reference, several evaluation items were selected for each type of argumentation (cooperative argumentation, competitive argumentation). We then asked the experts (A, B, a
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 14:02:49 | 只看該作者
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 17:26:06 | 只看該作者
978-981-19-2930-4The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapor
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 19:42:27 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-317-6In law schools, argumentation exercises [Adachi 84, Kitamura 95, Iida 06, Iwata 07, Fukuzawa 10] for acquiring argumentation skills and case studies [Nitta 97] for teaching precedents occupy a large weight, and legal education that integrates argumentation skills and precedent analysis is important.
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 00:38:15 | 只看該作者
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-12 02:03
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
黎城县| 冀州市| 临泽县| 金阳县| 榆树市| 微山县| 翼城县| 潜山县| 庄浪县| 宁津县| 兴山县| 七台河市| 和平区| 十堰市| 连山| 沙坪坝区| 广饶县| 罗山县| 福海县| 武山县| 麻江县| 杭州市| 行唐县| 晋宁县| 化德县| 左贡县| 晋城| 缙云县| 尚志市| 喀喇| 竹溪县| 平果县| 石柱| 天镇县| 怀集县| 剑河县| 南岸区| 马关县| 双柏县| 垫江县| 菏泽市|