找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Unity, Truth and the Liar; The Modern Relevance Shahid Rahman,Tero Tulenheimo,Emmanuel Genot Book 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

[復制鏈接]
樓主: fumble
41#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 16:15:56 | 只看該作者
42#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 19:22:49 | 只看該作者
43#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 01:58:49 | 只看該作者
44#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 03:50:00 | 只看該作者
Comments on Stephen Read’s “The Truth-Schema and the Liar”ates it using the resources of modern logic. His formulation seems to me to be impeccable. He also gives a pointed criticism of another medieval view (the view that every sentence says of itself that it is true). Attempts to provide a definition of truth for a language that contains a truth predicat
45#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 09:41:51 | 只看該作者
Models for Liars in Bradwardine’s Theory of Truth I give models for Read‘s formulation of Bradwardine‘s theory of truth, and I examine the behaviour of liar sentences in those models. I conclude by examining Bradwardine‘s argument to the effect that if something signifies itself to be untrue then it signifies itself to be true as well. We will see
46#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 13:18:13 | 只看該作者
On a New Account of the Liarthe Liar paradox using an improved formulation of Tarski‘s T-scheme. Examining the orthodox and the new account of the Liar shows two different ways of tackling the problem of modelling the underlying logic of Liar-type discourse. Specific discussion is provided of Read‘s key notions of . and ., whi
47#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 17:31:16 | 只看該作者
The Liar Cannot Be Solvedhe claims turns the Liar paradox into an innocent sentence, which is simply false. In my note I examine the way Read tries to solve the paradox and argue that some doubts can be raised regarding the successfulness of his attempt. I analyze his project from two independent points of view. First, I tr
48#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 19:53:07 | 只看該作者
Out of the Liar TangleBut underlying them is a grammatical point that has much wider repercussions. For it generates, on its own, a more straight forward way of understanding what gets people into a tangle with Liar and Strengthened Liar sentences, and that leads to a much fuller, critical assessment of the line of appro
49#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 00:23:30 | 只看該作者
50#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 05:03:25 | 只看該作者
Restrictionism: A Medieval Approach Revisitedtionism has been popular in the thirteenth and early fourteenth century, and then rapidly lost ground to rival theories such as Bradwar-dine‘s. The aim of this paper is twofold: (1) to explain what medieval restrictionism amounted to as a matter of historical fact and why it came to be abandoned; (2
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網 吾愛論文網 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-5 04:36
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
溧水县| 定陶县| 胶州市| 阜宁县| 桃园市| 江北区| 肇州县| 平陆县| 兴安县| 汶上县| 清苑县| 安仁县| 沽源县| 拉孜县| 鹤壁市| 永寿县| 榆树市| 威海市| 平昌县| 山西省| 青冈县| 塔城市| 五原县| 山阳县| 雅江县| 城步| 齐河县| 英德市| 福州市| 宁强县| 五河县| 泾源县| 上高县| 云梦县| 宜阳县| 镇江市| 茌平县| 伊宁县| 大名县| 台中县| 合江县|