Titlebook: Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering; Richard K. Chang,Thomas E. Furtak Book 1982 Plenum Press, New York 1982 electron.electron energy loss s

Cumbersome

Coverage Dependencehancement process. The dependence of the enhancement factor on the distance away from the metal surface is an experimentally measurable quantity which can be compared with theoretical predictions. Also, in the submonolayer regime, comparisons of the SERS spectra with coverage-dependent bonding behav

出處

得意人

Tunnel Junction Structuresals was remarkable, since the molecular layers were present only in monolayer coverages, and were separated from the incident laser beam by a typically 20 nm thick metal film. In fact, the Raman scattering could be measured because the observed signal levels were up to ~ 5x10. times more intense per

承認(rèn)

Electrochemical Effectsposited on inert substrates are illustrated in Fig. 1.. These experiments already showed that as little as two monolayers of the solid phases could be detected on a liquid substrate using the spectrometer systems then available. Since that time there has been only a limited number of measurements of

inflate

chronology

Allege

Inelastic Mie Scattering from Rough Metal Surfacesn the large enhancements. While it is generally agreed that surface roughness is important, the specific nature of this roughness, and its exact role in the enhancement has been a subject of considerable debate. In this chapter, we discuss experimental results that address this question directly. We

demote

Calculus

安慰