找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Similar Practice, Different Rationales; Political Fact-Check Laurens Lauer Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under

[復(fù)制鏈接]
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 03:24:56 | 只看該作者
Laurens Lauers to be enhanced and that there was a willingness exhibited by individuals to engage in tasks and discussions. It is argued that teaching and learning can be enriched as the technological tools and pedagogical processes are brought together in appropriate ways. By referring to the integration of tec
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 07:51:30 | 只看該作者
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 14:37:34 | 只看該作者
Book 2024pertise, visions, and strategies. This book delves into this fascinating world, exploring how theconcept of fact-checking has proliferated globally. Spotlighting efforts in Argentina, Georgia, Italy, and the U.S., it offers an in-depth understanding of fact-checkers‘ approaches, their alignment with
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 15:50:45 | 只看該作者
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 23:58:10 | 只看該作者
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 00:45:40 | 只看該作者
Comparing Fact-Checking Initiatives Around the World,plary selection of the increasingly growing community of fact-checkers in 2016. They are either initial pioneers of the concept or early adopters, whose links highlight how the idea of fact-checking travels, which elements of it are being adopted consistently, ar undergoing adjustment or are novel extensions.
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 06:28:26 | 只看該作者
Fact-Checking Initiatives in Different Political-Media Contexts, context triggers specific logics of political fact-checking by: (a) appealing as an idea to different social groups to varying degrees; and (b) favoring certain rationales regarding their legitimacy in more general terms.
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 09:31:33 | 只看該作者
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 13:48:15 | 只看該作者
Introduction,in his time as vice president. Readers of the website, many new ones among them thanks to Cheney, could find the facts about the Halliburton issue and the most critical claims raised during the debate the next day in a long piece titled “Cheney & Edwards Mangle Facts”.
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 18:05:56 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-6 10:57
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
廊坊市| 噶尔县| 祁门县| 西畴县| 临邑县| 牡丹江市| 定兴县| 华蓥市| 三河市| 河津市| 嵊泗县| 肥乡县| 湘乡市| 资溪县| 确山县| 三穗县| 盘锦市| 洛南县| 忻城县| 天门市| 宁海县| 晋中市| 进贤县| 皋兰县| 怀柔区| 句容市| 全南县| 开阳县| 米林县| 东丰县| 蚌埠市| 安塞县| 木兰县| 沂水县| 北海市| 江门市| 五华县| 云林县| 永修县| 石门县| 柳河县|