找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Rethinking Thomas Kuhn’s Legacy; Yafeng Shan Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springe

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 諷刺文章
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 06:42:04 | 只看該作者
Revolutionary Analogiesnd, the fact that many new paradigms (understood here as ‘exemplars’) have borne out of analogies is partly explained by the fact that, compatibly with Kuhn’s requirement of ‘open-endedness’ or ‘fruitfulness’ on paradigms, they contained immediately graspable indications as to their extensions to no
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 10:43:43 | 只看該作者
Kuhn on Creativity and Tradition in Educationo later work and debates in science education, cognitive science, and neighboring disciplines. First, I shall argue that Kuhn’s ideas about convergent thought resonate well with both empirical and theoretical work from prominent scholars in education, cognitive science, and philosophy. Second, I sha
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 14:00:58 | 只看該作者
Kuhn, Popper, the Military-Industrial Complex and the Techno-scientific Revolutionnce was coupled with his political philosophy, Kuhn tended to conceal the political implications of his views. Popper, Lakatos and Watkins stressed the political implications of any view on scientific development, whereas Kuhn tried to avoid them. The essay explains the difference between the two ap
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 17:02:31 | 只看該作者
Kuhn’s ‘Does Knowledge “Grow”?’: Second Thoughts on the Nature of Epistemic Progressning to reexamine some of his main theses in .. A special emphasis was made on the relationship between his account of scientific revolutions and the nature of knowledge. As he was a critic of traditional foundationalism, he opted for a different point of view, more sympathetic to his renewing persp
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 20:02:41 | 只看該作者
Normal Science and Tradition in the Non-West: Divergence in Adherence in West and East Asiat shifts to focus on medical compilers from each cultural context, Abū Bakr al-Rāzī (d. 925/932) and Tanba no Yasuyori (d. 995), to discuss their compilatory activities, their relationship to the larger traditions, and how adherence to such practices led to divergence from tradition.
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 03:15:12 | 只看該作者
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 07:15:44 | 只看該作者
Kuhn on Creativity and Tradition in Educationsts. I shall argue that Kuhn’s analysis of science education at the university level was rooted in a historical context where enrollment was low, and that the immense growth of science that has happened over the last half century calls instead for education of scientists that bridges rather than deepens the divide between pure and applied science.
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 08:38:35 | 只看該作者
Kuhn, Popper, the Military-Industrial Complex and the Techno-scientific Revolution for hegemony in the progressive camp. The relationship between history and philosophy of science and the apparent lack of interest in technology are among the facets of Kuhn’s and Popper’s philosophies that may be better understood by looking at the political dimension of philosophy of science during the Cold War.
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 14:36:14 | 只看該作者
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 20:10:00 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-17 04:05
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
宁城县| 云和县| 马公市| 西林县| 清新县| 漯河市| 无棣县| 安吉县| 竹北市| 桦川县| 株洲县| 西乡县| 子长县| 巴彦淖尔市| 温宿县| 阳曲县| 奉化市| 石首市| 岑溪市| 波密县| 泽州县| 顺平县| 嘉定区| 浙江省| 武城县| 安图县| 麻阳| 岑溪市| 铁岭县| 巴马| 泰顺县| 沐川县| 富锦市| 新津县| 五河县| 谢通门县| 三河市| 盘锦市| 文山县| 汨罗市| 金川县|