找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Rethinking Thomas Kuhn’s Legacy; Yafeng Shan Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springe

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 諷刺文章
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:43:07 | 只看該作者
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 17:25:21 | 只看該作者
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 18:27:35 | 只看該作者
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 23:50:37 | 只看該作者
Thomas Kuhn, Modern Mathematics and the Dynamics of Reasonersity Press, Oxford, 1992) which took as their central question the usefulness for the philosophy of mathematics of Kuhn’s constructions in the philosophy of science. Important work was done to see whether the concepts of ‘revolution’ and ‘paradigm’ made sense there. However, a feature of the colle
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 04:02:21 | 只看該作者
Kuhn, Progress, and Knowing-How: An Epistemological-Functional Account of Scientific Progressogress comes down to improved problem-solving. It is important to realize that Kuhn talks about the progress of scientific .. This raises the question of in what sense exactly problem-solving is knowledge. This chapter then has two main goals. The first is to explain Kuhn’s account of problem-solvin
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 08:37:33 | 只看該作者
Worlds, Algorithms, and Niches: The Feedback-Loop Idea in Kuhn’s Philosophyuniversal algorithm thesis, and the niche-construction analogy. We will do that by resorting to a hitherto neglected notion employed by Kuhn: the idea of a feedback loop. We will show that this notion captures an important structural aspect of the epistemic dynamics at work in each of the three thes
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 14:05:17 | 只看該作者
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 18:21:44 | 只看該作者
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 21:42:34 | 只看該作者
Kuhn and Philosophyt it was ignored or snubbed and passed over in philosophical anthologies or textbooks. Secondly, I discuss how ., nevertheless, impacted philosophical development. Finally, I offer an explanation of Kuhn’s marginalization in analytic philosophy that goes beyond the prevalent view which says that he
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 23:13:14 | 只看該作者
Reappraising Kind Conceptsoncepts would be acquired through ostension and organized into hierarchical structures, also known as “taxonomies”. However, in one of his last papers, Kuhn introduced a second type of kind concept, one that is established through law-like generalisations, the singletons. In this chapter, I argue th
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-17 02:01
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
正阳县| 玛曲县| 永定县| 和田县| 金秀| 尼木县| 奉化市| 鄄城县| 东乌珠穆沁旗| 邵东县| 绥棱县| 新乡县| 深水埗区| 南京市| 临城县| 尼木县| 阿拉善盟| 萝北县| 义乌市| 隆子县| 格尔木市| 黄龙县| 吉林市| 开江县| 普安县| 通江县| 沙田区| 杭锦旗| 荥经县| 崇阳县| 田林县| 西乡县| 赞皇县| 闽清县| 榆林市| 富民县| 景泰县| 来安县| 盐津县| 麻江县| 靖西县|