Titlebook: Rethinking Knowledge; The Heuristic View Carlo Cellucci Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license

FATAL

Other Questions About Knowledgetion; that knowledge cannot be obtained merely by deduction, but requires non-deductive reasoning; and that knowledge cannot be obtained by sticking to an abstract ideal of rigour, since what is important is not rigour but fruitfulness, hence the concept of rigour is better replaced with that of fruitfulness.

Immunoglobulin

誰在削木頭

Perceptual Knowledgehe objections against it. It also maintains that perception may involve data from several sense organs. In particular, vision is based on the fact that we form hypotheses about objects of the external world from stimuli on the retina and from movements of the eye, head or of the whole body, by means of deductive inferences.

Handedness

syncope

Muscularis

catagen

The Foundationalist Viewith a milder version, the weak foundationalist view, according to which immediately justified knowledge, while not being absolutely certain, has at least some intrinsic credibility. But the chapter argues that the weak foundationalist view also is based on some unjustified assumptions.

Intruder

The Limits of Scepticismd by two schools discussed by Aristotle, Sextus Empiricus’ indeterminacy doubt, Descartes’ dream doubt, Descartes’ demon doubt, and Hume’s induction doubt. The chapter also argues that, contrary to the widespread opinion that absolute scepticism stands on the side of logic and reason, absolute scepticism stands on the side of mysticism.

DOTE

Knowledge, Plausibility, and Common Senseusses the relation between scientific knowledge and common sense knowledge, arguing that, rather than being opposed to common sense knowledge, scientific knowledge gives an explanation of our common sense knowledge, providing an interpretation of it.

cogent