找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Rethinking Commonsense Psychology; A Critique of Folk P Matthew Ratcliffe Book 2007 Matthew Ratcliffe 2007 critique.developmental psycholog

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 32176|回復(fù): 42
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:15:42 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Rethinking Commonsense Psychology
副標(biāo)題A Critique of Folk P
編輯Matthew Ratcliffe
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/829/828992/828992.mp4
叢書名稱New Directions in Philosophy and Cognitive Science
圖書封面Titlebook: Rethinking Commonsense Psychology; A Critique of Folk P Matthew Ratcliffe Book 2007 Matthew Ratcliffe 2007 critique.developmental psycholog
描述This book offers arguments against the view that interpersonal understanding involves a ‘folk‘ or ‘commonsense‘ psychology, a view which Ratcliffe suggests is a theoretically motivated abstraction. His alternative account draws on phenomenology, neuroscience and developmental psychology, exploring patterned interactions in shared social situations.
出版日期Book 2007
關(guān)鍵詞critique; developmental psychology; interaction; neuroscience; phenomenology; psychology; understanding
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/9780230287006
isbn_ebook978-0-230-28700-6Series ISSN 2946-2959 Series E-ISSN 2946-2967
issn_series 2946-2959
copyrightMatthew Ratcliffe 2007
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Rethinking Commonsense Psychology影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Rethinking Commonsense Psychology影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Rethinking Commonsense Psychology網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Rethinking Commonsense Psychology網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Rethinking Commonsense Psychology被引頻次




書目名稱Rethinking Commonsense Psychology被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Rethinking Commonsense Psychology年度引用




書目名稱Rethinking Commonsense Psychology年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Rethinking Commonsense Psychology讀者反饋




書目名稱Rethinking Commonsense Psychology讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:43:24 | 只看該作者
Where is the Commonsense in Commonsense Psychology?, any training. And it arises and persists in much the same form regardless of what one might know about scientific psychology. Hence it is not a ‘pop science’ acquired by educated non-scientists but an understanding that is possessed by educated and uneducated alike.
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:17:42 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:28:49 | 只看該作者
Commonsense Psychology, Theory of Mind and Simulation,gers, the holders of certain social roles and statuses, neighbours, competitors, lovers, friends or family. And we interact with each other in all sorts of ways. Negotiating one’s way along a busy shopping street alongside several hundred others, with the occasional exchange of nods, smiles or frown
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:26:17 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:16:14 | 只看該作者
The World We Live in,ibute beliefs and desires to other people in a vacuum. When we do so, we take for granted not only that the other person is already in a world but that we are both in the same world. Furthermore, it is not simply a matter of assuming the same shared context in every instance. Aspects of an interpret
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:41:32 | 只看該作者
Letting the World do the Work,is ‘deeply and almost exclusively mentalistic’. Some proponents of FP do acknowledge that other factors are important and also that such factors might facilitate some instances of social understanding and interaction without the aid of FP. For example, Botterill and Carruthers (1999), having discuss
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:21:10 | 只看該作者
Perceiving Actions,mative, it can account not only for why an action was performed but also for why it ought to have been performed. Furthermore, it can do so without involving propositional attitudes. Not all situational understanding relates to particular actions. For example, interpretations of what commuters do ev
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:14:26 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:46:42 | 只看該作者
Beliefs and Desires, in shared situations, is often all we need to facilitate the level of understanding required for successful interaction and coordination. Even when we explain actions in terms of reasons, we often do so by referring to aspects of situations, rather than to psychological states. In addition to this,
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-18 20:06
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
平江县| 石狮市| 明星| 罗定市| 济源市| 雅安市| 应城市| 腾冲县| 合山市| 蒲江县| 东安县| 交城县| 平乡县| 松桃| 东丰县| 武安市| 茶陵县| 龙海市| 正镶白旗| 伊金霍洛旗| 文成县| 汕尾市| 张北县| 钟山县| 祁门县| 房产| 高淳县| 永靖县| 宁津县| 门头沟区| 依兰县| 绵阳市| 峨边| 岫岩| 灌南县| 临朐县| 革吉县| 融水| 泰兴市| 安泽县| 长兴县|