Titlebook: Rescuing Reason; A Critique of Anti-R Robert Nola Book 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003 Ludwig Wittgenstein.Marx.Michel

ATE

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Rescuing Reason影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Rescuing Reason影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Rescuing Reason網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Rescuing Reason網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Rescuing Reason被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Rescuing Reason被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Rescuing Reason年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Rescuing Reason年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Rescuing Reason讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Rescuing Reason讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

誰(shuí)在削木頭

Book 2003o-political factors, or by our interests in the socio-political - the view of sociologists of "knowledge"? Or does it result from interplay of relations of power - the view of Michel Foucault? Or does our knowledge arise from "the will to power" - the view of Nietzsche? This volume sets out to criti

jealousy

Introductionview of Michel Foucault? Or does our knowledge arise from “the will to power” — the view of Nietzsche? It is argued here that, despite their large contemporary following, the latter fail badly to make their case against advocates of rationality and methodology in science and knowledge.

palliate

The Problem of Knowledgevarious conceptions of scientific knowledge. As will be seen subsequently, some of the dethroners of our critical tradition have given up on the goal of knowledge and have either embraced scepticism about our ever knowing anything, or have fallen into an easy relativism.

王得到

crescendo

Genealogy, Power and Knowledgen explanatory enterprise in which, according to Foucault, what does most of the explaining is power; what is to be explained are how various discourses are adopted and maintained, and why they are changed and then abandoned. Also to be explained are the various kinds of knowledge, including what Foucault calls . and ..

Ige326

The Edinburgh Connection II: Strong and Wrongelief. What will be argued is that advocates of SP have overlooked one important model of explanation for false, irrational and unsuccessful beliefs that undercuts much of the opposition they falsely set up between philosopher’s rational models for scientific belief and their own causal models.

細(xì)微差別

大廳

語(yǔ)言學(xué)

The Problem of Knowledgeof knowledge and of scientific knowledge based in method. Further attempts by sociologists of scientific knowledge, Foucault and Nietzsche along these lines are critically reviewed in Parts II to IV. In contrast, in this chapter and the next the task is more positive. They sketch some of the expecta