找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Representational Content and the Objects of Thought; Nicholas Rimell Book 2021 Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press 2021 mental content.con

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 51076|回復(fù): 39
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:14:20 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Representational Content and the Objects of Thought
編輯Nicholas Rimell
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/828/827444/827444.mp4
概述Ties together a variety of important questions in metaphysics, philosophy of mind , and philosophy of language.Offers an exposition of leading versions of content internalism, including David Chalmers
圖書封面Titlebook: Representational Content and the Objects of Thought;  Nicholas Rimell Book 2021 Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press 2021 mental content.con
描述.This book defends a novel view of mental representation—of how, as thinkers, we represent the world as being. The book serves as a response to two problems in the philosophy of mind. One is the problem of first-personal, or egocentric, belief: how can we have truly first personal beliefs—beliefs in which we think about ourselves as ourselves—given that beliefs are supposed to be attitudes towards propositions and that propositions are supposed to have their truth values independent of a perspective??.The other problem is? how we can think about nonexistents (e.g., Santa Claus) given the widespread view that thought essentially involves a relation between a thinker and whatever is being thought about. The standard responses to this puzzle are either to deny that thought is essentially relational or to insist that it is possible to stand in relations to nonexistents. This book offers an error theory to the problem...The responses from this book arise from thesame commitment: a commitment to treating talk of propositions—as the things towards which our beliefs are attitudes—as talk of entities that actually exist and that play a constitutive and explanatory role in the activity of th
出版日期Book 2021
關(guān)鍵詞mental content; content internalism; content externalism; objects of thought; propositions; first-persona
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3517-5
isbn_softcover978-981-16-3519-9
isbn_ebook978-981-16-3517-5
copyrightShanghai Jiao Tong University Press 2021
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Representational Content and the Objects of Thought影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Representational Content and the Objects of Thought影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Representational Content and the Objects of Thought網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Representational Content and the Objects of Thought網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Representational Content and the Objects of Thought被引頻次




書目名稱Representational Content and the Objects of Thought被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Representational Content and the Objects of Thought年度引用




書目名稱Representational Content and the Objects of Thought年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Representational Content and the Objects of Thought讀者反饋




書目名稱Representational Content and the Objects of Thought讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:12:41 | 只看該作者
Narrow Representational Content,h this debate from subtly different debates. I then lay out the main argument for externalism. The argument’s crucial premise is . (CFT), the claim that thoughts cannot have the same representational content while differing in truth value. If CFT is true, internalism is false and externalism is true
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 04:24:27 | 只看該作者
Narrow Content and Propositions,inherit the contents of—propositions. Second, necessarily, propositions have truth values, and they have these truth values absolutely. Thus, there are no . propositions. It is commonly recognized that these two tenets jointly entail Content Fixes Truth (CFT), the claim that thoughts cannot have the
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 04:46:38 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:55:30 | 只看該作者
Why We Cannot Think about Nonexistents,itutively involves a thinker’s standing in a relation to an object of thought, then it is impossible to think about nonexistents. I present an argument that is clearly valid. I then argue that, to make sense of the validity of this argument, we must accept that thinking constitutively involves a rel
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:16:03 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:27:08 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:07:10 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:30:08 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:38:27 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-6 18:17
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
平远县| 左云县| 侯马市| 潮安县| 泸州市| 汉川市| 体育| 兴化市| 饶平县| 定安县| 德安县| 新竹县| 阳谷县| 上思县| 双流县| 正阳县| 德安县| 通辽市| 辽阳市| 万载县| 内丘县| 大港区| 大足县| 鸡东县| 综艺| 南溪县| 邢台县| 和静县| 芒康县| 兴安盟| 恩施市| 朝阳区| 海安县| 股票| 延寿县| 商南县| 黄梅县| 屯昌县| 江安县| 钦州市| 望城县|