找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Relativism and Religion; Charles M. Lewis (Professor of Philosophy) Book 1995 Wake Forest University 1995 pluralism.religion.semantics

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 17567|回復(fù): 39
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:28:17 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Relativism and Religion
編輯Charles M. Lewis (Professor of Philosophy)
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/827/826196/826196.mp4
叢書名稱Library of Philosophy and Religion
圖書封面Titlebook: Relativism and Religion;  Charles M. Lewis (Professor of Philosophy) Book 1995 Wake Forest University 1995 pluralism.religion.semantics
描述This collection of recent essays confronts, from widely disparate perspectives, fundamental questions about the epistemology and semantics of religious claims. Is there any way, apart from a particular religious tradition, of knowing that the distinctive claims of a religious tradition are true or closer to truth than those of any other religion? Does ‘God‘ in religious speech and texts refer to the same Being as does philosophical theism? A response by each contributor to the others‘ ideas is included.
出版日期Book 1995
關(guān)鍵詞pluralism; religion; semantics
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24132-3
isbn_softcover978-1-349-24134-7
isbn_ebook978-1-349-24132-3Series ISSN 2947-0242 Series E-ISSN 2947-0250
issn_series 2947-0242
copyrightWake Forest University 1995
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Relativism and Religion影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Relativism and Religion影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Relativism and Religion網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Relativism and Religion網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名




書目名稱Relativism and Religion被引頻次




書目名稱Relativism and Religion被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Relativism and Religion年度引用




書目名稱Relativism and Religion年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Relativism and Religion讀者反饋




書目名稱Relativism and Religion讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:48:08 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:52:05 | 只看該作者
The Justificationist Roots of Relativism,irrors of one another: the relativist affirms what the anti-relativist denies. Yet beyond this simple relation of negation the two are as different as chalk and cheese. Relativism has a justificationist structure and an authoritarian epistemology to go with it. Anti-relativism, by contrast, can be formulated free from those deficiencies.
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:41:40 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:20:50 | 只看該作者
A Prayer for Understanding, Civil War, entered this blunt prayer in his diary just before the Battle of Edgehill in 1642. It is addressed by one officer to another. God, as supreme C.O., will know that there is work to do and that it will be better done if He is out of mind until close of play. Being a no-nonsense sort of cha
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:25:38 | 只看該作者
Religious Pluralism and Religious Relativism,uth. At least some of the adherents of each system appear to be perfectly rational in having the religious beliefs they do. What are we to make of this situation? In a recent discussion Joseph Runzo outlines six possible responses to the conflicting truth-claims of the world’s religions.. Naturalism
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:38:44 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:16:07 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 02:49:09 | 只看該作者
Concluding Responses,en two forms of relativism. Epistemic relativism involves the relativization of epistemic statuses such as being justified or being rational. Semantic or metaphysical relativism involves the relativization of reference or truth or both. There are individualistic forms of both doctrines, but it is mo
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:37:06 | 只看該作者
Book 1995s claims. Is there any way, apart from a particular religious tradition, of knowing that the distinctive claims of a religious tradition are true or closer to truth than those of any other religion? Does ‘God‘ in religious speech and texts refer to the same Being as does philosophical theism? A resp
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-5 15:19
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
东明县| 新源县| 昌宁县| 永吉县| 永德县| 潍坊市| 浮山县| 东乡县| 凤山县| 伊通| 方山县| 临安市| 公安县| 巫山县| 沙坪坝区| 巴彦县| 莱芜市| 东明县| 和林格尔县| 阳泉市| 铁力市| 体育| 嘉峪关市| 施秉县| 郎溪县| 右玉县| 镇原县| 上蔡县| 望都县| 益阳市| 墨竹工卡县| 沧州市| 寿宁县| 合水县| 鹤岗市| 巢湖市| 五指山市| 准格尔旗| 霞浦县| 万安县| 武鸣县|