Titlebook: Relativism and Religion; Charles M. Lewis (Professor of Philosophy) Book 1995 Wake Forest University 1995 pluralism.religion.semantics

radionuclides

書目名稱Relativism and Religion影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Relativism and Religion影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Relativism and Religion網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Relativism and Religion網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Relativism and Religion被引頻次




書目名稱Relativism and Religion被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Relativism and Religion年度引用




書目名稱Relativism and Religion年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Relativism and Religion讀者反饋




書目名稱Relativism and Religion讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

敘述

伙伴

The Justificationist Roots of Relativism,irrors of one another: the relativist affirms what the anti-relativist denies. Yet beyond this simple relation of negation the two are as different as chalk and cheese. Relativism has a justificationist structure and an authoritarian epistemology to go with it. Anti-relativism, by contrast, can be formulated free from those deficiencies.

強制性

BUCK

A Prayer for Understanding, Civil War, entered this blunt prayer in his diary just before the Battle of Edgehill in 1642. It is addressed by one officer to another. God, as supreme C.O., will know that there is work to do and that it will be better done if He is out of mind until close of play. Being a no-nonsense sort of cha

dissent

Religious Pluralism and Religious Relativism,uth. At least some of the adherents of each system appear to be perfectly rational in having the religious beliefs they do. What are we to make of this situation? In a recent discussion Joseph Runzo outlines six possible responses to the conflicting truth-claims of the world’s religions.. Naturalism

Leaven

FEAT

anagen

Concluding Responses,en two forms of relativism. Epistemic relativism involves the relativization of epistemic statuses such as being justified or being rational. Semantic or metaphysical relativism involves the relativization of reference or truth or both. There are individualistic forms of both doctrines, but it is mo

起波瀾

Book 1995s claims. Is there any way, apart from a particular religious tradition, of knowing that the distinctive claims of a religious tradition are true or closer to truth than those of any other religion? Does ‘God‘ in religious speech and texts refer to the same Being as does philosophical theism? A resp