找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Relating Indigenous and Settler Identities; Beyond Domination Avril Bell Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers L

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: abandon
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 23:29:22 | 只看該作者
Indigenous Authenticity and Settler Nationalisms by which indigenous peoples are expected to operate according to tradition but settler peoples are not. The idea that settler societies should remain bound to the practices in use at the time of their arrival in the ‘New World’ is patently ridiculous, so why is the same idea in relation to indigeno
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 03:07:52 | 只看該作者
Hybrid Identities and the ‘One-way Street’ of Assimilationroblem’ only. Like race — and for related, highly racialized reasons — hybridity is not a problem for the settler. Despite the many sources of hybridity within the settler population (mixed descent and histories of migration and of culture contact with indigenous and other peoples), a century after
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 05:28:22 | 只看該作者
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 12:37:04 | 只看該作者
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 15:54:35 | 只看該作者
‘Deep Colonizing’: The Politics of Recognitionies. If settler peoples accept the rights of indigenous peoples to establish the boundaries of their own communities and collective identities, and their rights to pursue their own ‘ways of life’, then how do settlers respond to indigenous claims and assertions as neighbours and co-citizens?. Given
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 20:11:56 | 只看該作者
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 00:43:14 | 只看該作者
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 02:51:57 | 只看該作者
Hybrid Identities and the ‘One-way Street’ of Assimilationltural difference.. As Sara Ahmed (2000: 189, n4) argues, hybridization is typically not a problem for white subjectivities constructed in terms of dynamism and pliability. In the excerpt above from her poem ‘Making Aborigines’, the Australian Aboriginal poet, Anita Heiss, draws attention to this discrepancy in the assignation of hybridity.
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 07:32:18 | 只看該作者
Performative Hybridity in the ‘Ruins of Representation’ntities as forever in process, unstable, dynamic, nomadic and ‘uprooted’. Rather than attend to the substance (hybridized or essentialized, ‘open’ or exclusionary) of identity claims, Bhabha’s focus is the process by which identities are uttered, reiterated, performed.
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 10:31:05 | 只看該作者
2947-7786 , Canada, New Zealand and the United States. The book argues that a new relational imaginary can revolutionize the way settler peoples think about and relate to indigenous difference.978-1-349-31480-5978-1-137-31356-0Series ISSN 2947-7786 Series E-ISSN 2947-7794
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-23 01:39
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
沙雅县| 巴彦县| 芒康县| 如东县| 海淀区| 巫山县| 江油市| 宜昌市| 霍城县| 马关县| 贵南县| 成都市| 茂名市| 五家渠市| 苗栗县| 克拉玛依市| 洛隆县| 宁乡县| 金堂县| 舒城县| 台州市| 建阳市| 漾濞| 博乐市| 和静县| 马龙县| 淳安县| 年辖:市辖区| 桑日县| 永和县| 永德县| 洛宁县| 伊金霍洛旗| 伽师县| 克什克腾旗| 赫章县| 嵩明县| 勐海县| 安泽县| 晋城| 安宁市|