Titlebook: Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity; From Old Liberties t Ulrike Mü?ig Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2018 The Edit

共用

書目名稱Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity被引頻次




書目名稱Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity年度引用




書目名稱Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity讀者反饋




書目名稱Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

燈絲

The Development of Constitutional Precedence and the Constitutionalization of Individual Rights,lishmen. I also show how notably in the case of the notorious “Septennial Act” of 1716, criticism that Parliament violated the “constitution” was expressed, and how about three decades later in the writings of Bolingbroke the word “unconstitutional” was born, gaining wide currency in the North Ameri

上流社會

Laconic

The Codification of the Polish Substantial Criminal Law in the Sejm Debates 1818,or parts..In the first, introductory part the origins of the 1815 Constitution are discussed. This part of the article presents the current state of the art of the polish legal history concerning the genesis of this highest normative act of the 1815–1830 Polish Kingdom. Following the explanations pr

征兵

Constitutional Precedence and the Genesis of the Belgian Constitution of 1831,bedded in the Belgian Constitution of 1831. It does so by combining a historical-genealogical approach with a legal one. The chapter begins with a discussion of the genesis of the Belgian Constitution in relation to the Fundamental Law of the United Kingdom of the Netherlands. It shows how the Belgi

SSRIS

Inaugurating a Dutch Napoleon? Conservative Criticism of the 1815 Constitution of the United Kingdoeaties. Following articles 57 and 58, international agreements could be concluded and ratified by the monarch, save for peacetime cessions of territory. The constitutional committee’s debates treat the matter rather hastily. William I (1772–1843)’s role at the establishment of the Kingdom of the Uni

ingrate

黃油沒有

COLIC

立即

Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2018ng the legal role of constitutional norms. Taken together with ReConFort I (National Sovereignty), it calls for an innovative reassessment of constitutional history drawing on key categories to convey the legal nature of the constitution itself (national sovereignty, precedence, justiciability of po