找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity; From Old Liberties t Ulrike Mü?ig Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2018 The Edit

[復制鏈接]
查看: 24525|回復: 43
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:04:53 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity
副標題From Old Liberties t
編輯Ulrike Mü?ig
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/825/824207/824207.mp4
概述Identifies constitutional normativity in European constitutions.Breaks new ground in approaches to constitutional history.Sheds new light on historical discourses concerning fundamental laws, constitu
叢書名稱Studies in the History of Law and Justice
圖書封面Titlebook: Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity; From Old Liberties t Ulrike Mü?ig Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2018 The Edit
描述.This second volume of ReConFort, published open access, addresses the decisive role of constitutional normativity, and focuses on discourses concerning the legal role of constitutional norms. Taken together with ReConFort I (National Sovereignty), it calls for an innovative reassessment of constitutional history drawing on key categories to convey the legal nature of the constitution itself (national sovereignty, precedence, justiciability of power, judiciary as constituted power)..In the late 18th and early 19th centuries, constitutional normativity began to complete the legal fixation of the entire political order. This juridification in one constitutional text resulted in a conceptual differentiation from ordinary law, which extends to alterability and justiciability. The early expressions of this ‘new order of the ages’ suggest an unprecedented and irremediable break with European legal tradition, be it with British colonial governance or the French ancien régime. In fact, while the shift to constitutions as a hierarchically ‘higher’ form of positive law was a revolutionary change, it also drew upon old liberties. The American constitutional discourse, which was itself heavily
出版日期Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2018
關(guān)鍵詞Precedence of Constitution; Normativity and Constitution; Constitutional History of Europe; Constitutio
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73037-0
isbn_softcover978-3-030-10304-0
isbn_ebook978-3-319-73037-0Series ISSN 2198-9842 Series E-ISSN 2198-9850
issn_series 2198-9842
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名




書目名稱Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity被引頻次




書目名稱Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity年度引用




書目名稱Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity讀者反饋




書目名稱Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:06:56 | 只看該作者
The Development of Constitutional Precedence and the Constitutionalization of Individual Rights,lishmen. I also show how notably in the case of the notorious “Septennial Act” of 1716, criticism that Parliament violated the “constitution” was expressed, and how about three decades later in the writings of Bolingbroke the word “unconstitutional” was born, gaining wide currency in the North Ameri
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:44:29 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:06:06 | 只看該作者
The Codification of the Polish Substantial Criminal Law in the Sejm Debates 1818,or parts..In the first, introductory part the origins of the 1815 Constitution are discussed. This part of the article presents the current state of the art of the polish legal history concerning the genesis of this highest normative act of the 1815–1830 Polish Kingdom. Following the explanations pr
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:35:48 | 只看該作者
Constitutional Precedence and the Genesis of the Belgian Constitution of 1831,bedded in the Belgian Constitution of 1831. It does so by combining a historical-genealogical approach with a legal one. The chapter begins with a discussion of the genesis of the Belgian Constitution in relation to the Fundamental Law of the United Kingdom of the Netherlands. It shows how the Belgi
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:57:25 | 只看該作者
Inaugurating a Dutch Napoleon? Conservative Criticism of the 1815 Constitution of the United Kingdoeaties. Following articles 57 and 58, international agreements could be concluded and ratified by the monarch, save for peacetime cessions of territory. The constitutional committee’s debates treat the matter rather hastily. William I (1772–1843)’s role at the establishment of the Kingdom of the Uni
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:26:14 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:27:25 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:24:09 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:14:50 | 只看該作者
Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2018ng the legal role of constitutional norms. Taken together with ReConFort I (National Sovereignty), it calls for an innovative reassessment of constitutional history drawing on key categories to convey the legal nature of the constitution itself (national sovereignty, precedence, justiciability of po
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-21 09:10
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
中西区| 固安县| 东海县| 迁西县| 山东| 鄂伦春自治旗| 南岸区| 长垣县| 称多县| 麦盖提县| 喀喇| 甘德县| 凤翔县| 无极县| 福州市| 沧州市| 万源市| 上蔡县| 闵行区| 翁牛特旗| 融水| 璧山县| 水城县| 达州市| 长岭县| 巴彦淖尔市| 大庆市| 民丰县| 乐业县| 攀枝花市| 射阳县| 德安县| 措勤县| 宝应县| 穆棱市| 屯留县| 兴城市| 潜山县| 阿鲁科尔沁旗| 伊吾县| 达日县|