找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: On Law and Reason; Aleksander Peczenik Book 2009Latest edition Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Argumentation.Legal Justification

[復制鏈接]
查看: 19322|回復: 37
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:06:14 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱On Law and Reason
編輯Aleksander Peczenik
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/702/701019/701019.mp4
概述Second edition of the best-seller On Law and Reason by the deceased Aleksander Peczenik.A timeless, unique view on the coherence theory of law.Newly added preface by prof. J.C. Hage
叢書名稱Law and Philosophy Library
圖書封面Titlebook: On Law and Reason;  Aleksander Peczenik Book 2009Latest edition Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Argumentation.Legal Justification
描述.‘This is an outline of a coherence theory of law. Its basic ideas are: reasonable support and weighing of reasons. All the rest is commentary.’. .These words at the beginning of the preface of this book perfectly indicate what On Law and Reason is about. It is a theory about the nature of the law which emphasises the role of reason in the law and which refuses to limit the role of reason to the application of deductive logic.. .In 1989, when the first edition of On Law and Reason appeared, this book was ground breaking for several reasons. It provided a rationalistic theory of the law in the language of analytic philosophy and based on a thorough understanding of the results, including technical ones, of analytic philosophy. That was not an obvious combination at the time of the book’s first appearance and still is not. The result is an analytical rigor that is usually associated with positivist theories of the law, combined with a philosophical position that is not natural law in a strict sense, but which shares with it the emphasis on the role of reason in determining what the law is. If only for this rare combination, On Law and Reason still deserves careful study.. .On Law and
出版日期Book 2009Latest edition
關鍵詞Argumentation; Legal Justification; Legal Logic; coherence theory; law; logic; natural law; nature of law; r
版次2
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8730-1
isbn_softcover978-1-4020-9706-5
isbn_ebook978-1-4020-8730-1Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315
issn_series 1572-4395
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱On Law and Reason影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱On Law and Reason影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱On Law and Reason網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱On Law and Reason網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱On Law and Reason被引頻次




書目名稱On Law and Reason被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱On Law and Reason年度引用




書目名稱On Law and Reason年度引用學科排名




書目名稱On Law and Reason讀者反饋




書目名稱On Law and Reason讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:26:23 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:39:52 | 只看該作者
The Dilemma of Legal Reasoning: Moral Evaluation or Description of the Law?,aginary cases. The most profound difference consists in the fact that legal dogmatics often claims to be more rational than legal practice, that is, more oriented towards general theses, supported by extensive arguments. The similarities are, however, far deeper than the differences.
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:18:30 | 只看該作者
The Doctrine of the Sources of the Law,tute law, case law etc. However, such a comprehensive study would exceed the limits of the present work. I must thus restrict the discussion to one country and one form of interpretation, that is, to Swedish customary norms, concerning the sources of the law and the method of statutory interpretation.
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:48:34 | 只看該作者
The Ultimate Justification of Moral and Legal Reasoning,1970, 24). The idea is applicable in many different contexts. A theory can thus be coherent with data. One theory can be coherent with another. Legal rules can be coherent with moral principles. Interpretation of a statute can be coherent with moral principles and such sources of the law as precedents; and so on.
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:37:13 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 20:43:53 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:01:54 | 只看該作者
1572-4395 se, but which shares with it the emphasis on the role of reason in determining what the law is. If only for this rare combination, On Law and Reason still deserves careful study.. .On Law and978-1-4020-9706-5978-1-4020-8730-1Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:28:40 | 只看該作者
ng levels of a thinking skills progression. Included in the partially completed ILPs were strategies assembled from a review of evidence-based instructional strategies for thinking skills that were matched to the case study student’s level of learning. The teachers reviewed and drafted learning goal
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:42:49 | 只看該作者
evelopment of learning or competence could be traced by following progress along the trait or growth continuum. Glaser (Am Psychol 18:519–521, 1963) proposed the concept of criterion-referenced interpretation of assessments. Like Rasch (1960, Some probabilistic models for the measurement of attainme
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-10 23:46
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
怀远县| 嘉兴市| 景宁| 梧州市| 青冈县| 台中市| 大化| 乐山市| 定兴县| 汝城县| 杭州市| 政和县| 南漳县| 松溪县| 陇南市| 类乌齐县| 泌阳县| 颍上县| 望都县| 阳山县| 浙江省| 信宜市| 林西县| 黄平县| 东宁县| 从江县| 襄汾县| 衡东县| 扶风县| 额尔古纳市| 鲁山县| 乌什县| 容城县| 伊通| 河北省| 潢川县| 万宁市| 天峨县| 邹平县| 吉首市| 龙门县|