Titlebook: On Law and Reason; Aleksander Peczenik Book 2009Latest edition Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Argumentation.Legal Justification

purulent

書目名稱On Law and Reason影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱On Law and Reason影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱On Law and Reason網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱On Law and Reason網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱On Law and Reason被引頻次




書目名稱On Law and Reason被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱On Law and Reason年度引用




書目名稱On Law and Reason年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱On Law and Reason讀者反饋




書目名稱On Law and Reason讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

LAY

哥哥噴涌而出

The Dilemma of Legal Reasoning: Moral Evaluation or Description of the Law?,aginary cases. The most profound difference consists in the fact that legal dogmatics often claims to be more rational than legal practice, that is, more oriented towards general theses, supported by extensive arguments. The similarities are, however, far deeper than the differences.

forbid

The Doctrine of the Sources of the Law,tute law, case law etc. However, such a comprehensive study would exceed the limits of the present work. I must thus restrict the discussion to one country and one form of interpretation, that is, to Swedish customary norms, concerning the sources of the law and the method of statutory interpretation.

消息靈通

The Ultimate Justification of Moral and Legal Reasoning,1970, 24). The idea is applicable in many different contexts. A theory can thus be coherent with data. One theory can be coherent with another. Legal rules can be coherent with moral principles. Interpretation of a statute can be coherent with moral principles and such sources of the law as precedents; and so on.

Observe

商業(yè)上

Fabric

1572-4395 se, but which shares with it the emphasis on the role of reason in determining what the law is. If only for this rare combination, On Law and Reason still deserves careful study.. .On Law and978-1-4020-9706-5978-1-4020-8730-1Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315

bronchodilator

ng levels of a thinking skills progression. Included in the partially completed ILPs were strategies assembled from a review of evidence-based instructional strategies for thinking skills that were matched to the case study student’s level of learning. The teachers reviewed and drafted learning goal

Intentional

evelopment of learning or competence could be traced by following progress along the trait or growth continuum. Glaser (Am Psychol 18:519–521, 1963) proposed the concept of criterion-referenced interpretation of assessments. Like Rasch (1960, Some probabilistic models for the measurement of attainme