找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Ne bis in idem and Multiple Sanctioning Systems; A Case Law Study of Javier Ignacio Escobar Veas Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) a

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: estrange
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 21:47:31 | 只看該作者
2524-8049 ossible protections against multiple sanctioning systems. Two other safeguards that limit multiple sanctioning systems are the prohibition of disproportionate sanctions and the right to be tried within a reasonable time.978-3-031-16558-0978-3-031-16556-6Series ISSN 2524-8049 Series E-ISSN 2524-8057
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 02:45:37 | 只看該作者
Case Law of the Supreme Court of the United StatesThe Fifth Amendment guarantee against double jeopardy is one of the basic protections afforded to defendants by the United States Constitution. The Fifth Amendment reads in part:
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 08:06:05 | 只看該作者
Case Law of the Supreme Court of CanadaSection?11 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms sets out several rights for anyone who is “charged with an offence”. Section?11 (h) of the Charter, which aims to protect the defendant against double jeopardy, states:
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 09:59:32 | 只看該作者
Case Law of the European Court of Human RightsThe . was not recognised in the European Convention of Human Rights until its incorporation in Article?4 of Protocol?7, which states:
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 17:27:49 | 只看該作者
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 20:30:35 | 只看該作者
Overcoming the Dead End of the Thesis of the Criminal NatureOne of the problems with the caselaw of the ECtHR and the CJEU addressed in the Second Part was the dead end of the current approach of the criminal nature thesis. As stated above, there are two problems with the current approach of the European courts.
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 22:01:56 | 只看該作者
Final RemarksAlthough the . is extensively proclaimed by national legal systems and international human rights instruments, several difficulties arise when the protection is applied to concrete cases, especially in the context of multiple sanctioning systems.
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 03:41:06 | 只看該作者
Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Unionin every Member State. In this context, the CJEU has jurisdiction to give preliminary rulings concerning the interpretation of EU Treaties. Thus, when a party raises a question regarding the EU Charter before a national court of a Member State, that tribunal may request the CJEU to give a ruling on that question.
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 09:02:28 | 只看該作者
Understanding Multiple Sanctioning Systems: Models of Organisation the task of developing a satisfactory interpretation on the lawfulness of multiple sanctioning systems under the .. Therefore, it is necessary to propose a general reconceptualisation of the . under Protocol?7 to the European Convention of Human Rights and the EU Charter.
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 12:10:48 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-8 06:40
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
勐海县| 武邑县| 昂仁县| 来安县| 湘潭市| 凌云县| 太仓市| 邻水| 巴林左旗| 个旧市| 延长县| 道孚县| 安龙县| 红河县| 河间市| 湘潭市| 武强县| 大关县| 西充县| 醴陵市| 大方县| 洞口县| 开化县| 故城县| 宜丰县| 马公市| 清水县| 砀山县| 尉氏县| 宜丰县| 平原县| 大同县| 吉木乃县| 古交市| 德令哈市| 海淀区| 大田县| 洛阳市| 平顺县| 桦南县| 洛阳市|