Titlebook: Ne bis in idem and Multiple Sanctioning Systems; A Case Law Study of Javier Ignacio Escobar Veas Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) a

estrange

書目名稱Ne bis in idem and Multiple Sanctioning Systems影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Ne bis in idem and Multiple Sanctioning Systems影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Ne bis in idem and Multiple Sanctioning Systems網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Ne bis in idem and Multiple Sanctioning Systems網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Ne bis in idem and Multiple Sanctioning Systems被引頻次




書目名稱Ne bis in idem and Multiple Sanctioning Systems被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Ne bis in idem and Multiple Sanctioning Systems年度引用




書目名稱Ne bis in idem and Multiple Sanctioning Systems年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Ne bis in idem and Multiple Sanctioning Systems讀者反饋




書目名稱Ne bis in idem and Multiple Sanctioning Systems讀者反饋學科排名

BYRE

Book 2023d by Protocol 7 to the ECHR and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. The first part is a comparative study regarding the lawfulness of multiple sanctioning systems under the ne bis in idem, studying the evolution and the current state of the case law of the United States Supreme Court, the Canadian

本能

Looking Beyond the he case of the ECtHR and the CJEU, the situation is even more problematic because they have solely applied the procedural protection. Instead of engaging in complicated analysis of the ., courts should start to consider other safeguards and develop guidelines regarding them.

供過于求

2524-8049 overing the relevant case law for four different jurisdictioThe aim of the book is to resolve the question of whether multiple sanctioning systems are contrary to the ne bis in idem under the regulation provided by Protocol 7 to the ECHR and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. The first part is a

Saline

Introduction, in an unlawful manner. The decision of the administrative agency became final. When the defendant is later criminally indicted for the same facts, she files a motion to dismiss on double jeopardy grounds. Can the government pursue criminal prosecution against the defendant, or does the imposition o

Constituent

Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Unionin every Member State. In this context, the CJEU has jurisdiction to give preliminary rulings concerning the interpretation of EU Treaties. Thus, when a party raises a question regarding the EU Charter before a national court of a Member State, that tribunal may request the CJEU to give a ruling on

Recessive

Understanding Multiple Sanctioning Systems: Models of Organisation the task of developing a satisfactory interpretation on the lawfulness of multiple sanctioning systems under the .. Therefore, it is necessary to propose a general reconceptualisation of the . under Protocol?7 to the European Convention of Human Rights and the EU Charter.

審問

deceive

LAIR