Titlebook: Leaving No Child Behind?; Options for Kids in Frederick M. Hess,Chester E. Finn Book 2004 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America

枕墊

Options for Low-Income Students: Evidence from the States,eak from traditional U.S. education policy by permitting students in low-performing schools (“schools needing improvement”) to move to other public schools where space is available, and to use their school’s Title I funds to pay for tutoring, or, in edspeak, “supplemental services.” But whether NCLB

hidebound

pus840

盡管

Michigan: False Start,dibility of the consequences that schools experience when they fail to meet their achievement targets. In Michigan, however, the clear message that NCLB is expected to send to schools has been muddied, and the sanctions foreseen under NCLB have been imposed weakly and capriciously. There is widespre

無(wú)畏

mercenary

,Choice and Supplemental Services in America’s Great City Schools,raders met the state’s reading standards in 2002. So when Paul Vallas took the reins of the long-struggling district in the summer of 2002, he pledged to dramatically raise student performance and do everything he could to meet the goals of a new federal law that President George W Bush had signed o

共同生活

枯燥

Worcester: Thunderous Clouds, No Rain,rodding to get him going. Just mention No Child Left Behind (NCLB), stand back, and watch: ., you know. But this is what we’re dealing with in terms of this insanity. Oh, it’s numbers and it looks great. We’ve got numbers. Simple. And it all looks great and it’s just killing, killing teachers and ki

PON

fidelity