找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Kantian Dignity and Trolley Problems in the Literature of Richard Wright; Michael Wainwright Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and T

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: SCOWL
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 10:13:04 | 只看該作者
Kantian Dignity and Trolley Problems in the Literature of Richard Wright978-3-031-40216-6Series ISSN 2634-579X Series E-ISSN 2634-5803
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 16:35:20 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40216-6Novel; Martha C Nussbaum; Immanuel Kant; Richard Wright; Short Story; Enlightenment
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 18:49:00 | 只看該作者
Book 2024his book draws on the philosophical thoughts of her contemporaries—Philippa Foot, John Rawls, Judith Jarvis Thomson, and Derek Parfit—to analyze?.Uncle Tom’s Children., especially “Down by the Riverside,” alongside other works by Wright. This approach emphasizes Wright’s recognition of the importance and integrity of Kant’s concept of dignity.
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 22:24:46 | 只看該作者
2634-579X Children, particularly “Down by the Riverside,” alongside eThis book examines the literature of African-American author Richard Wright and the philosophy of Immanuel Kant, arguing that Wright was not only the foremost proponent of minoritarian protest literature, but also a groundbreaking minoritar
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 02:23:20 | 只看該作者
Introduction: Contesting Equilibria: Martha C. Nussbaum Versus John Rawls,rds or rules; reflection is paramount in resolving moral conundrums. Nussbaum’s notion does not depend on the measurement of moral choices against philosophical standards; perception is paramount in resolving moral conundrums. This chapter leaves the choice between these approaches open.
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 07:58:44 | 只看該作者
Kantian Dignity,usly not attended” (Richard Rorty xvi). While Nussbaum’s attempt to conciliate literary theory and ethical theory founders on the writerly attributes of James’s literature, Wright offers a readerly alternative by which to forge such consilience.
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 14:42:16 | 只看該作者
Philosophical Literature,ogical and an expectational side to Kant’s dignitarian imperative: affirming not only the libertarian rights of individuals and collectives but also individual and collective duties toward the freedom and well-being of others. Analyzing “Big Boy Leaves Home” from . confirms this conclusion.
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 15:18:41 | 只看該作者
Trolley Problems,mployed by literary theorists, but trolley problems, to which philosopher Philippa Foot gave birth in “The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect,” have not, as the remainder of this chapter explores.
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 21:08:43 | 只看該作者
Lifeboats,s and to the study of Wright’s corpus. Thereafter, aligning Mann’s lifeboat dilemmas when trying to save his family from the flood in “Down by the Riverside” with Parfit’s . is not only apt but also revealing.
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 02:11:56 | 只看該作者
,Richard Wright’s Travails of Mann,e a stunningly rational vision. This clarity of insight elicits self-effacing wisdom. Mann dies on his own terms: at worst, his self-effacement does not equate to self-defeat; at best, his self-effacement equates to self-actualization.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-7 22:59
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
开封市| 苍南县| 濮阳县| 长汀县| 黑山县| 平塘县| 屯留县| 郧西县| 唐河县| 林芝县| 武功县| 班戈县| 阳泉市| 许昌县| 铜山县| 石城县| 辽中县| 招远市| 太康县| 晋州市| 鸡东县| 东海县| 新巴尔虎右旗| 木里| 蒲城县| 三门县| 永和县| 蒲城县| 长泰县| 崇信县| 福鼎市| 松潘县| 玉林市| 根河市| 楚雄市| 合水县| 兰坪| 延庆县| 江陵县| 武宣县| 永胜县|