找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Harming Future Persons; Ethics, Genetics and Melinda A. Roberts,David T. Wasserman Book 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Chil

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 19352|回復(fù): 48
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:09:36 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Harming Future Persons
副標(biāo)題Ethics, Genetics and
編輯Melinda A. Roberts,David T. Wasserman
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/425/424252/424252.mp4
概述Examines what we owe future persons from both moral and legal perspectives.Deeply probes particular concerns in areas ranging from the new reproductive technologies to the structure of morality.Ranges
叢書名稱International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine
圖書封面Titlebook: Harming Future Persons; Ethics, Genetics and Melinda A. Roberts,David T. Wasserman Book 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Chil
描述Melinda A. Roberts and David T. Wasserman 1 Purpose of this Collection What are our obligations with respect to persons who have not yet, and may not ever, come into existence? Few of us believe that we can wrong those whom we leave out of existence altogether—that is, merely possible persons. We may think as well that the directive to be “fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth” 1 does not hold up to close scrutiny. How can it be wrong to decline to bring ever more people into existence? At the same time, we think we are clearly ob- gated to treat future persons—persons who don’t yet but will exist—in accordance with certain stringent standards. Bringing a person into an existence that is truly awful—not worth having—can be wrong, and so can bringing a person into an existence that is worth having when we had the alternative of bringing that same person into an existence that is substantially better. We may think as well that our obligations with respect to future persons are triggered well before the point at which those persons commence their existence. We think it would be wrong, for example, to choose today to turn the Earth of the future into a miserable place even if
出版日期Book 2009
關(guān)鍵詞Children‘s rights; Consequentialism; Ethics; Future Generations; Harm; Ligation; Reproductive; bioethics; ge
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5697-0
isbn_softcover978-94-007-2604-8
isbn_ebook978-1-4020-5697-0Series ISSN 1567-8008 Series E-ISSN 2351-955X
issn_series 1567-8008
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Harming Future Persons影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Harming Future Persons影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Harming Future Persons網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Harming Future Persons網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Harming Future Persons被引頻次




書目名稱Harming Future Persons被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Harming Future Persons年度引用




書目名稱Harming Future Persons年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Harming Future Persons讀者反饋




書目名稱Harming Future Persons讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:46:07 | 只看該作者
Wrongful Life and Procreative Decisionsarticular impairment precludes a minimally decent life, there will be circumstances in which a future life is unlikely to hold a reasonable promise of containing the things that make human lives good. In these circumstances, and if reproduction is avoidable, we are required to forego reproduction altogether.
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:04:45 | 只看該作者
The Nonidentity Problem and the Two Envelope Problem: When is One Act Better for a Person than Anothn just the cases in respect of which one important type of nonidentity problem has long been thought to show “no harm done” and (2) . in the two envelope problem, which purports to show “harm done” when the subject refuses endlessly to switch from one envelope to another and back again.
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:21:01 | 只看該作者
der substantiell unterschiedlichen Effekte, die unter dem Begriff ?AgendaSetting? oft leichtfertig subsumiert werden. Um mit der einleitenden Metapher zu sprechen: die von den blinden M?nnern ertasteten wissenschaftlichen Teilbefunde passen einfach nicht zusammen, sie scheinen vielmehr Teile ganz verschiedener Tiere zu sein..
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:52:34 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:47:26 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 20:09:18 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:10:12 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:34:34 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:27:45 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-9 06:23
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
富裕县| 达孜县| 海南省| 台前县| 长武县| 元朗区| 呼伦贝尔市| 涡阳县| 海南省| 崇礼县| 红桥区| 高台县| 高唐县| 木兰县| 临漳县| 虎林市| 肇州县| 哈密市| 通辽市| 资阳市| 舒城县| 华宁县| 安远县| 陇西县| 临清市| 稻城县| 晋城| 县级市| 龙川县| 定陶县| 汕头市| 曲沃县| 永兴县| 衡阳县| 应用必备| 武定县| 寿宁县| 华池县| 台中市| 南陵县| 南溪县|