找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Harming Future Persons; Ethics, Genetics and Melinda A. Roberts,David T. Wasserman Book 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Chil

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 19353|回復(fù): 48
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:09:36 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Harming Future Persons
副標(biāo)題Ethics, Genetics and
編輯Melinda A. Roberts,David T. Wasserman
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/425/424252/424252.mp4
概述Examines what we owe future persons from both moral and legal perspectives.Deeply probes particular concerns in areas ranging from the new reproductive technologies to the structure of morality.Ranges
叢書名稱International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine
圖書封面Titlebook: Harming Future Persons; Ethics, Genetics and Melinda A. Roberts,David T. Wasserman Book 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Chil
描述Melinda A. Roberts and David T. Wasserman 1 Purpose of this Collection What are our obligations with respect to persons who have not yet, and may not ever, come into existence? Few of us believe that we can wrong those whom we leave out of existence altogether—that is, merely possible persons. We may think as well that the directive to be “fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth” 1 does not hold up to close scrutiny. How can it be wrong to decline to bring ever more people into existence? At the same time, we think we are clearly ob- gated to treat future persons—persons who don’t yet but will exist—in accordance with certain stringent standards. Bringing a person into an existence that is truly awful—not worth having—can be wrong, and so can bringing a person into an existence that is worth having when we had the alternative of bringing that same person into an existence that is substantially better. We may think as well that our obligations with respect to future persons are triggered well before the point at which those persons commence their existence. We think it would be wrong, for example, to choose today to turn the Earth of the future into a miserable place even if
出版日期Book 2009
關(guān)鍵詞Children‘s rights; Consequentialism; Ethics; Future Generations; Harm; Ligation; Reproductive; bioethics; ge
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5697-0
isbn_softcover978-94-007-2604-8
isbn_ebook978-1-4020-5697-0Series ISSN 1567-8008 Series E-ISSN 2351-955X
issn_series 1567-8008
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Harming Future Persons影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Harming Future Persons影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Harming Future Persons網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Harming Future Persons網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Harming Future Persons被引頻次




書目名稱Harming Future Persons被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Harming Future Persons年度引用




書目名稱Harming Future Persons年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Harming Future Persons讀者反饋




書目名稱Harming Future Persons讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:46:07 | 只看該作者
Wrongful Life and Procreative Decisionsarticular impairment precludes a minimally decent life, there will be circumstances in which a future life is unlikely to hold a reasonable promise of containing the things that make human lives good. In these circumstances, and if reproduction is avoidable, we are required to forego reproduction altogether.
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:04:45 | 只看該作者
The Nonidentity Problem and the Two Envelope Problem: When is One Act Better for a Person than Anothn just the cases in respect of which one important type of nonidentity problem has long been thought to show “no harm done” and (2) . in the two envelope problem, which purports to show “harm done” when the subject refuses endlessly to switch from one envelope to another and back again.
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:21:01 | 只看該作者
der substantiell unterschiedlichen Effekte, die unter dem Begriff ?AgendaSetting? oft leichtfertig subsumiert werden. Um mit der einleitenden Metapher zu sprechen: die von den blinden M?nnern ertasteten wissenschaftlichen Teilbefunde passen einfach nicht zusammen, sie scheinen vielmehr Teile ganz verschiedener Tiere zu sein..
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:52:34 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:47:26 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 20:09:18 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:10:12 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:34:34 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:27:45 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-9 08:23
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
高碑店市| 石林| 临高县| 云梦县| 郧西县| 武清区| 阳新县| 墨竹工卡县| 司法| 平远县| 获嘉县| 富蕴县| 德昌县| 洞头县| 临夏市| 闸北区| 义马市| 富平县| 侯马市| 凤山县| 岢岚县| 石渠县| 平湖市| 阳朔县| 噶尔县| 芜湖县| 辰溪县| 中西区| 杭锦旗| 汝南县| 鲁甸县| 理塘县| 绥阳县| 水富县| 德钦县| 广平县| 辽阳市| 枣阳市| 库伦旗| 前郭尔| 焉耆|