Titlebook: Handbook of African Philosophy of Difference; Elvis Imafidon Reference work 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 Aesthetic Differences

明顯

書(shū)目名稱Handbook of African Philosophy of Difference影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Handbook of African Philosophy of Difference影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Handbook of African Philosophy of Difference網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Handbook of African Philosophy of Difference網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Handbook of African Philosophy of Difference被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Handbook of African Philosophy of Difference被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Handbook of African Philosophy of Difference年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Handbook of African Philosophy of Difference年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Handbook of African Philosophy of Difference讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Handbook of African Philosophy of Difference讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Synovial-Fluid

省略

African Communitarianism and Differencethreaten to occlude difference. Often, it has been Western defenders of liberty who have raised the concern that these characteristically sub-Saharan values fail to account adequately for individuality, although some contemporary African thinkers have expressed the same concern. In this chapter, I p

原諒

White’s Anti-black Racism and the Attitude of Tolerating Racial Differenceshat tolerance is a universal moral virtue for living a good moral life is questionable, especially in the context of racial differences and racism between white Europeans’ claimed superiority and the supposed inferiority of black Africans. I argue that if tolerance has any value, it is instrumental

包租車船

棲息地

Decolonization of the West, Desuperiorization of Thought, and Elative Ethicscolonization. We will attempt to identify the dangers that come from this refusal, such as the continued adherence to colonial patterns, the enduring self-understanding as being superior compared to Africa, and the persisting unwillingness to accept colonial guilt. Decolonization must be understood

冒失

V.Y. Mudimbe’s Archaeological Reading of Africa’s Difference in Cultural History (1988). It sees Mudimbe’s archaeological approach to Africa’s difference in cultural history as moving beyond Eurocentrism and Afrocentrism, yet as uncritically taking for granted Foucault’s archaeology of the Same and the Other. The concerns of this chapter are twofold. On the one hand, it brings

tattle

Toward a Postcolonial Universal Ontology Hence, on an ontological level, the other or difference has been denied or excluded, which accounts for the violence of the colonial logic of conceptualizing African alterity or difference. The challenge of thinking the postcolonial situation in the African context has mostly been how to think libe

SKIFF

Alterity, African Modernity, and the Critique of Change the West or foreign cultures has mainly described the modern experience in African spaces as a predicament, an unfortunate distortion of the pre-modern status quo or systems in Africa. In this chapter I intend to explore a perspective for understanding and appreciating the description of the Africa

沒(méi)有希望

Enriching the Knowledge of the Other Through an Epistemology of Intercourseesianism of epistemic duality, an orientation that has primary consideration for subject-object dichotomy, the knower and the known, the I and the thou, and the center and the periphery. In such considerations, what is of the center perceives what is not as an “other.” This disposition about the oth