Titlebook: Habermas, Foucault and the Political-Legal Discussions in China; A Discourse on Law a Fan Yang Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and

reflection

entice

可卡

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93064-0g question: In accordance with the . and the political/legal discussions in traditional China under this influence, what are they like? What are the differences in comparison to Habermas’s claims? What are the roles that power relations and . played in these discussions?

appall

Introduction,xt has always been an important concern. Since the . in 1919, when the concepts of . (德先生, Mr. De) and . (賽先生, Mr. Sai) were introduced into Chinese society on a wide scale, democracy has been regarded as the inevitable issue in the modernisation of Chinese society.

用不完

: Another Normative Interpretation on Discourse Theory,and makes some comparisons with Habermas’s concept of . and Foucault’s .. Although the conception of Confucian Rationality is also a type of normative interpretation, we believe that it may play an important role in balancing the tension between Habermas’s and Foucault’s two normative theories.

choroid

synovitis

RAGE

Susan Laird,Kristen Ogilvie Holzerted in eight themes from both a philosophical and sociological perspective. Although there is extensive research on the differentiation between them in Western academia, we discuss and define it from a new perspective. Specifically, we show that the difference between Foucault and Habermas is a type

誹謗

Christine Woyshner,Anne Meis Knupferand makes some comparisons with Habermas’s concept of . and Foucault’s .. Although the conception of Confucian Rationality is also a type of normative interpretation, we believe that it may play an important role in balancing the tension between Habermas’s and Foucault’s two normative theories.

ATP861