書(shū)目名稱(chēng) | Habermas, Foucault and the Political-Legal Discussions in China | 副標(biāo)題 | A Discourse on Law a | 編輯 | Fan Yang | 視頻video | http://file.papertrans.cn/421/420374/420374.mp4 | 概述 | Serves as the first book comparing the discourse theories of Habermas and Foucault with Chinese traditional thoughts.Is the first book to explore the tension between normative discourse theory and pol | 圖書(shū)封面 |  | 描述 | This book revisits the discourse theories of Habermas and Foucault in a Chinese context. After arguing that Habermas’s Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy is too normative and idealistic, it presents Foucault’s Discourse Theory of Power Relations to illustrate the tensions between different Western discourse theories. The book then draws on the normative concept of Confucian Rationality from traditional Chinese cultural sources in order to investigate how adaptable these two discourse theories are to the Chinese society, and to balance the tension between them. Presenting these three dimensions of discourse theory, as well as the relations between them, it also uses empirical descriptions of certain facts of political-legal discussion both in traditional China and in the country’s new media age to explain, supplement and question this theoretic framework..The book asserts that, because of the diverse modes of thinking in specific cultures, there might be different normative paradigms of discorse and different political-legal discussion modes across corresponding cultural contexts. Normative discourse theories provide guidance for the practices of deliberative democracy and legal | 出版日期 | Book 2022 | 關(guān)鍵詞 | Habermas and Foucault; Rationality and Power; Deliberative Democracy in China; Confucian Rationality; Di | 版次 | 1 | doi | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0132-4 | isbn_softcover | 978-981-19-0134-8 | isbn_ebook | 978-981-19-0132-4 | copyright | The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapor |
The information of publication is updating
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Habermas, Foucault and the Political-Legal Discussions in China影響因子(影響力) 
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Habermas, Foucault and the Political-Legal Discussions in China影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名 
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Habermas, Foucault and the Political-Legal Discussions in China網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度 
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Habermas, Foucault and the Political-Legal Discussions in China網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名 
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Habermas, Foucault and the Political-Legal Discussions in China被引頻次 
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Habermas, Foucault and the Political-Legal Discussions in China被引頻次學(xué)科排名 
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Habermas, Foucault and the Political-Legal Discussions in China年度引用 
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Habermas, Foucault and the Political-Legal Discussions in China年度引用學(xué)科排名 
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Habermas, Foucault and the Political-Legal Discussions in China讀者反饋 
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Habermas, Foucault and the Political-Legal Discussions in China讀者反饋學(xué)科排名 
|
|
|