找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: ;

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: Withdrawal
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 10:05:06 | 只看該作者
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 15:45:55 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-94455-9iables, causal links, polarity, delay, feedback, stocks, flows, rates, equifinality, and multifinality. Group model building describes a variety of methods for involving clients or stakeholders in the creation of a system dynamics model.
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 21:24:53 | 只看該作者
Organisation der Personalwirtschaftupports increases in consensus, insight, communication quality, commitment to conclusions, and process efficiency, compared with other tools. This chapter summarises this evidence and presents a possible research agenda for filling key gaps.
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 00:38:42 | 只看該作者
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 04:17:01 | 只看該作者
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 09:18:46 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-86060-6is to support group decision-making. This chapter explores the outcomes that are sought or desired by clients commissioning group decision-making processes. Evidence is drawn from New Zealand public servants, and literature from other contexts. Clients tend to be strongly interested in achieving enduring consensus between participants.
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 13:41:09 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-8131-8orts on four case studies from the New Zealand public sector, using an observational study design and a commonly used post-workshop survey tool. The case studies show evidence of increased communication quality, insight, consensus, and commitment to conclusions.
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 18:11:58 | 只看該作者
Arbeitsplatz- und Arbeitszeitgestaltung,usible explanations in the context of the cases explored in this book: operator logic; system archetypes; modelling as persuasion; boundary objects; and cognitive bias. This chapter reports on interviews with 30 participants in group model building workshops to examine the relative level of support for each proposed mechanism.
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 22:12:54 | 只看該作者
Desired Outcomes of Group Decisions,is to support group decision-making. This chapter explores the outcomes that are sought or desired by clients commissioning group decision-making processes. Evidence is drawn from New Zealand public servants, and literature from other contexts. Clients tend to be strongly interested in achieving enduring consensus between participants.
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 02:10:55 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-7 15:52
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
梁山县| 开平市| 乐山市| 郸城县| 金门县| 祥云县| 绵阳市| 信宜市| 长子县| 通州区| 台东市| 博白县| 甘孜| 巨野县| 肥乡县| 德格县| 靖远县| 巴中市| 扎鲁特旗| 巨鹿县| 衡山县| 平遥县| 大埔县| 潼南县| 中卫市| 舒兰市| 长汀县| 彭州市| 乌鲁木齐县| 通化市| 凤凰县| 红河县| 库尔勒市| 泗洪县| 长垣县| 孟州市| 泰安市| 宁安市| 宁国市| 乐安县| 海南省|