Titlebook: Global Justice and the Politics of Recognition; Tony Burns,Simon Thompson Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers

LEVEE

書目名稱Global Justice and the Politics of Recognition影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Global Justice and the Politics of Recognition影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Global Justice and the Politics of Recognition網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Global Justice and the Politics of Recognition網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Global Justice and the Politics of Recognition被引頻次




書目名稱Global Justice and the Politics of Recognition被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Global Justice and the Politics of Recognition年度引用




書目名稱Global Justice and the Politics of Recognition年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Global Justice and the Politics of Recognition讀者反饋




書目名稱Global Justice and the Politics of Recognition讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

蟄伏

Blood-Clot

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230297340 It examines various meanings of the terms as the notions are used in practical life to express aspects of social and political life, and more specifically and stipulatively in social and political theories. In so doing, it examines the pros and cons of the ways in which the terms are employed and u

Dendritic-Cells

The Beverages Roleplay and Gamesoughout. I will also assume that the concept of cosmopolitanism encompasses both distributive and non-distributive issues, focusing my attention on the latter. The title of my paper, with its reference to the philosophy of Hegel, to cosmopolitan political thought, and to contemporary recognition the

neutralize

ERP: Enterprise Resource Planningr object the basic structure of a society regarded as what John Rawls called ‘a(chǎn) closed system isolated from other societies’ (Rawls, 1971: 8).. Only Nancy Fraser has proved an exception to this rule, with her development of an account of justice in which the power to determine the boundaries of poli

提名

Manpreet Arora,Roshan Lal Sharmandividuals, solidarity concerns itself with the welfare of citizens who are ‘intimately linked in an intersubjectively shared form of life’ (Habermas, 1990: 244). In emphasizing this indispensable reciprocity, Habermas goes beyond a simple meaning of solidarity as a binding force within groups, insi

提名

arbovirus

metropolitan

Traumatic-Grief

Introduction, bringing together two bodies of literature which, up until recently, have for the most part been kept in a state of separation from one another, to the detriment of both. The second is to connect a discussion of these issues to the philosophy of G. W. F. Hegel.