Titlebook: Global Iconoclasm: Contesting “Official” Mnemonic Landscapes; Michael Ripmeester,Matthew W. Rofe Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) a

VALID

Book 2024e echoes of Mussolini’s Fascist Italy by way of the decolonization of sites in Australia, New Zealand, Colombia and Africa the processes of landscape contestation are innovatively teased out by established and newly emerging scholars. This book should be of interest to any scholar interested in the politics of mnemonic landscapes..

Mirage

粘土

Fires and Insect Pest Management,ysis of the Tsunami Museum, we argue that while memorials adopt authority and tranquillity to enhance a sense of remembering, this very beauty can be manoeuvred to exclude ugly memories. In sum, we contend that what you see in public spaces is not a complete story.

Amylase

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07975-9on focuses on the appropriateness of maintaining these statues and monuments while the intangible heritage important to local communities is ignored and marginalized. This paper aims at exploring the discourse of surrounding the reverence given by the colonial past?while community cultural values ar

教育學(xué)

詢問

Trichome, Lotuseffekt und Haftstrukturen,uitable framework for Aboriginal people to reclaim Country and their cultural heritage or whether these documents remain entrenched in colonial modes of thinking/acting that continue to disempower Aboriginal people, denying them restitution of Country and cultural heritage.

內(nèi)行

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-15918-6otion to remove the monument. These events produced active public engagement through three channels: direct lobbying of local officials, traditional mass media coverage, and social media commentary. In this chapter, we attempt to understand the motivations held by individuals on both sides of this c

植物學(xué)

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64077-7and, is now being actively countered by social protests focused on memorials to ‘explorers’ and colonial administrators. In addition, a trend to memorialise and commemorate the massacres of Aboriginal peoples as part of the colonisation process is overturning the myth that Australia was peacefully s

膽汁

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-67778-6social and political actors. Through in-depth interviews and mapping, this chapter will foreground and examine the personal experiences of people directly involved in the collective occupation of ‘Dignity Square’. In this way, it aims to gain insight in the role of public space as the site and subje

guzzle

Defeating the Panopticon,ocussed public pressure onto colonial monuments. It is well understood but rarely confronted however, that architectural design itself was entirely complicit in the advancements of colonisation and the rendering of racial hierarchies (Mossman, 2018). This is what makes the State and community sponso