找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy; Ondrej Majer,Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen,Tero Tulenheim Book 2009 Springer Science+Business Me

[復制鏈接]
樓主: 租期
41#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 15:58:07 | 只看該作者
42#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 18:57:29 | 只看該作者
Why Play Logical Games? the lack of a convincing philosophical account of logical games, what it means to play them, for the proponent to win, etc., pointedly raised by Wilfrid Hodges as the ‘Dawkins question’. In this paper, I critically examine two available answers: after a brief discussion of an argument by Tennant ag
43#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 23:56:10 | 只看該作者
On The Narrow Epistemology of Game-Theoretic Agentsanations shows that they do not conform to the belief-desire framework of action explanation. Epistemic characterization theorems (specifying sufficient conditions for game-theoretic solution concepts to obtain) are argued to be the canonical way to make game theory conform to that framework. The be
44#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 03:14:06 | 只看該作者
Fallacies as Cognitive Virtuesric mission. In so doing, it has taken on in a quite general way a game-theoretic character, precisely as it was with the theory of syllogistic refutation in the . and ., where Aristotle develops winning strategies for disputations. The approach that the present authors take toward the logic of prac
45#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 11:19:04 | 只看該作者
A Strategic Perspective on if Gamesimperfect information. In this paper we set up a strategic framework for the evaluation of IF logic à la Hintikka and Sandu. We show that the traditional semantic interpretation of IF logic can be characterized in terms of Nash equilibria. We note that moving to the strategic framework we get rid of
46#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 14:15:09 | 只看該作者
Towards Evaluation Games for Fuzzy Logicszation of the evaluation games for classical logic. It is shown that it provides an interesting contribution to the model theory of fuzzy logics as, unlike the standard semantics, it can deal with the so-called non-safe models. The second kind of semantics makes explicit the intuition about fuzzy lo
47#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 19:09:17 | 只看該作者
Games, Quantification and Discourse Structure deal of attention has been paid to truth conditions, the contributions of quantifiers to the discourse have been little studied. This paper seeks to rectify this by developing a set of game rules that account both for the truth conditional and the discourse contributions of quantified expressions.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-16 05:25
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
尼木县| 金乡县| 兰坪| 高州市| 芦溪县| 中方县| 汉川市| 阳原县| 澄迈县| 贵港市| 苏尼特左旗| 同仁县| 宜丰县| 华亭县| 高邑县| 鸡东县| 石台县| 进贤县| 柘城县| 简阳市| 左贡县| 聂拉木县| 鄂托克前旗| 大连市| 阿合奇县| 临沧市| 礼泉县| 婺源县| 河西区| 雷山县| 江永县| 博罗县| 黄石市| 本溪| 永顺县| 珠海市| 喜德县| 都江堰市| 兖州市| 远安县| 宁夏|