Titlebook: Game Theory, Social Choice and Ethics; H. W. Brock Book 1979 D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Holland, and Boston, U.S.A. 1979 game th

ambivalence

the methods of game theory, decision theory, and axiomatic social choice theory can help to illuminate ethical questions central not only to moral theory, but also to normative public policy analysis. Before discussion of the contents of the papers, it should prove helpful to recall a number of pioneering pap978-94-009-9534-5978-94-009-9532-1

COST

LAY

樸素

Wolfram Hilz,Shushanik Minasyan,Maciej Ra?remote as well as near, at some cost to ourselves — cannot be justified by appeal to the welfare of remote future generations. He questions whether they can be justified at all. The problem is that the failure to adopt such a policy would not make any of our distant descendants worse off that he wou

SYN

Criteria

施舍

兩棲動(dòng)物

Gesellschaftstheorie im Anschlu? an Simmel?someone is is to be measured by an ‘index’ of ‘primary social goods’. It is this index that gives content to the principle, and Rawls gives no adequate directions for constructing it. In this essay a version of the difference principle is proposed that fits much of what Rawls says, but that makes us

枕墊

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-20438-1 maximization is the only decision criterion consistent with rationality. On the other hand, the Bayesian criterion, together with the Pareto optimality requirement, inescapably entails a utilitarian theory of morality. The next sections discuss the role both of cardinal utility and of cardinal inte

cutlery