Titlebook: Game Theory, Social Choice and Ethics; H. W. Brock Book 1979 D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Holland, and Boston, U.S.A. 1979 game th

HARDY

書(shū)目名稱Game Theory, Social Choice and Ethics影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Game Theory, Social Choice and Ethics影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Game Theory, Social Choice and Ethics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Game Theory, Social Choice and Ethics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Game Theory, Social Choice and Ethics被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Game Theory, Social Choice and Ethics被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Game Theory, Social Choice and Ethics年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Game Theory, Social Choice and Ethics年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Game Theory, Social Choice and Ethics讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Game Theory, Social Choice and Ethics讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

土坯

,Don’t Shoot The Trumpeter - He’s Doing His Best!,rly between them is discussed, along with alternative solutions that have been put forward. These solutions are criticized for the shared assumption that the object of distribution is utility rather than opportunity. The author proposes a different approach and works out its implications for the pro

胰臟

身心疲憊

破譯

Hot-Flash

Hot-Flash

,Disparate Goods and Rawls’ Difference Principle: A Social Choice Theoretic Treatment,someone is is to be measured by an ‘index’ of ‘primary social goods’. It is this index that gives content to the principle, and Rawls gives no adequate directions for constructing it. In this essay a version of the difference principle is proposed that fits much of what Rawls says, but that makes us

截?cái)?/a>

ESPY

Decision-Making Under Ignorance with Implications for Social Choice,n the first section the author introduces a set of properties which might characterize a criterion for decision-making under complete ignorance. Two of these properties are novel: ‘independence of non-discriminating states’, and ‘weak pessimism’. The second section provides a new characterization of

總