找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Evaluating Schools; Dynamic Production o Moritz G. Sowada Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licens

[復制鏈接]
查看: 43482|回復: 43
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:01:11 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Evaluating Schools
副標題Dynamic Production o
編輯Moritz G. Sowada
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/321/320766/320766.mp4
概述Presents a novel focus on evaluation practice.Provides a description of school inspectors as street-level bureaucrats.Draws on literature from psychology to sociology of valuation and evaluation
圖書封面Titlebook: Evaluating Schools; Dynamic Production o Moritz G. Sowada Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licens
描述.This book provides an analysis of how inspection teams evaluate schools – especially how they decide on assigning scores. It shows how the governance of schools through evaluation is enacted pragmatically. With its focus on the practice of evaluation by a group of external experts, it contributes to the expanding interdisciplinary field devoted to studying phenomena of the ‘evaluation society’ spanning from assessment research to programme evaluation, from the psychology of decision-making to the sociology of valuation and evaluation...Additionally, it argues that official inspection systems frame the inspection process, but cannot fully determine scoring practice. The implementation of official scoring guidelines is characterized by irreducible uncertainty requiring professional discretion for its resolution. Inspection teams thus must employ a flexible and pragmatic approach to finalize their scoring task. By drawing on empirical data from six observed inspection teams from two German states, it provides profound insights into how real evaluation decisions were made. This book is valuable to anyone seeking to understand evaluation in education – in particular scholars, policy-ma
出版日期Book 2024
關鍵詞evaluation practice; discretion; judgement formation; professional judgement; school evaluation; school i
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-62324-0
isbn_softcover978-3-031-62326-4
isbn_ebook978-3-031-62324-0
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Evaluating Schools影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Evaluating Schools影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Evaluating Schools網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Evaluating Schools網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Evaluating Schools被引頻次




書目名稱Evaluating Schools被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Evaluating Schools年度引用




書目名稱Evaluating Schools年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Evaluating Schools讀者反饋




書目名稱Evaluating Schools讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:15:33 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:32:40 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3958-1lves active discursive work by inspectors to establish what constitutes normal performance and justify divergences from the norm. Scoring discussions are shaped by tensions between following standardised procedures and exercising professional discretion to account for school-specific contexts.
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:04:57 | 只看該作者
A Framework to Conceptualise the Scoring Work of School Inspection Teams,xity of scoring tasks, internal and external constraints, and the distinction between scoring processes and products further illuminate the dynamics of inspection judgements. The framework avoids overreliance on a single rigid approach, instead carefully employing multiple lenses to engage meaningfully with the empirical data on scoring work.
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:07:13 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:38:20 | 只看該作者
Steps of Scoring Discussions by School Inspection Teams,lves active discursive work by inspectors to establish what constitutes normal performance and justify divergences from the norm. Scoring discussions are shaped by tensions between following standardised procedures and exercising professional discretion to account for school-specific contexts.
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:42:19 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:54:47 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:49:21 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47522-1 on illuminating the process and conditions shaping score production, especially how disagreements are resolved. Key contributions of this study for a more sophisticated understanding of inspection dynamics are outlined. The chapter concludes with an overview of the book structure.
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:13:48 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66655-6space for inspection teams to enact scoring based on their situated practices and professional vision. The chapter argues that scoring work is best understood as a partially bounded discretionary practice, given the limits of official guidelines in fully determining scoring decisions in practice.
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-5 09:30
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
桃园市| 泽普县| 海宁市| 正定县| 南靖县| 兴安盟| 永昌县| 扶沟县| 屯门区| 疏勒县| 周宁县| 定兴县| 蓬溪县| 宜春市| 轮台县| 南宁市| 扎兰屯市| 保德县| 揭阳市| 池州市| 灵武市| 武冈市| 板桥市| 许昌县| 咸阳市| 平度市| 鄢陵县| 金川县| 印江| 辉县市| 柳州市| 灵石县| 济阳县| 陕西省| 宁城县| 宝山区| 德兴市| 正安县| 固原市| 庆安县| 应城市|