找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Ezumezu; A System of Logic fo Jonathan O. Chimakonam Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to

[復制鏈接]
樓主: CYNIC
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 00:29:36 | 只看該作者
Justifying the System of Ezumezu Logic: An Analysis of the Problematic Structure of ‘q na abughi q’itted exercise of investigating the structure: ‘q na abughi q’ which I suppose to be the hub of all controversies surrounding the logic question in African philosophy in this contemporary time. I will conclude following the insight of W. V. O. Quine that bad translators are responsible for the creat
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 03:17:44 | 只看該作者
tle. African philosophers can now ground their discourses in Ezumezu logic which will distinguish their philosophy as a tradition in its own right. On the whole, the book engages with some of the lingering con978-3-030-11075-8
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 06:17:33 | 只看該作者
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 11:38:24 | 只看該作者
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 17:08:06 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/b138374philosophy through the framework of Ezumezu. To accomplish this task, I seek to mount a defence for postmodern thinking and then project Ezumezu from this methodological purview. To do all this, I will first demolish the pretensions of European philosophy weaved into the modern mindview which errone
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 18:45:07 | 只看該作者
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 22:46:12 | 只看該作者
Paula Agostinho,Catarina R. Oliveira pillars of Ezumezu logic namely, nwa-nsa, nwa-nju and nwa-izugbe already discussed in the preceding chapter. Finally, I will demonstrate the formal structure of Ezumezu logic using its two argument types called arumaristic and ohakaristic to show how conclusions could be drawn from premises.
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 03:42:39 | 只看該作者
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 08:45:59 | 只看該作者
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 12:27:43 | 只看該作者
e logic system for grounding African philosophy and studies.The issue of a logic foundation for African thought connects well with the question of method. Do we need new methods for African philosophy and studies? Or, are the methods of Western thought adequate for African intellectual space? These
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-8 00:49
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
鹿泉市| 枣阳市| 凤台县| 阿图什市| 天峨县| 凤凰县| 汝城县| 高陵县| 五莲县| 甘南县| 东光县| 比如县| 新建县| 垦利县| 泌阳县| 邵阳市| 景泰县| 崇阳县| 镇沅| 林芝县| 金溪县| 行唐县| 武平县| 旬阳县| 阜南县| 定结县| 尚义县| 昌宁县| 饶阳县| 泰顺县| 江口县| 司法| 宜丰县| 贡嘎县| 广南县| 呼图壁县| 大洼县| 蕲春县| 周口市| 无棣县| 进贤县|